Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24821823›Full record

SynthesisThe oncologist2014

Adjuvant therapy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a systematic review of the evidence, guidelines, and clinical practice in the U.S.

Nawar A Latif, Ashley Haggerty, Stephanie Jean, Lilie Lin, Emily Ko

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The oncologist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Endometrial Carcinoma, Grossing and Processing Issues: Recommendations of the International Society of Gynecologic Pathologists.International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nawar A LatifDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ashley HaggertyDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Stephanie JeanDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lilie LinDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Emily KoDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Emily.Ko@uphs.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

REPRODUCTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING GRANTT32HD007440 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BARNHART, KURT T · 1996 to 2020
$7.5M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the U.S., with an increasing incidence likely secondary to the obesity epidemic. Surgery is usually the primary treatment for early stage endometrial cancer, followed by adjuvant therapy in selected cases. This includes radiation therapy [RT] with or without chemotherapy, based on stratification of patients into categories dependent on their future recurrence risk. Several prospective trials (PORTEC-1, GOG#99, and PORTEC-2) have shown that the use of adjuvant RT in the intermediate risk (IR) and the high-intermediate risk (HIR) groups decreases locoregional recurrence (LRR) but has no effect on overall survival. The ad hoc analyses from these studies have shown that an even larger LRR risk reduction was seen within the HIR group compared with the IR group. Vaginal brachytherapy is as good as external beam radiotherapy in controlling vaginal relapse where the majority of recurrence occur, and with less toxicity. In the high-risk group, multimodality therapy (chemotherapy and RT) may play a significant role. Although adjuvant RT has been evaluated in many cost-effectiveness studies, high-quality data in this area are still lacking. The uptake of the above prospective trial results in the U.S. has not been promising. Factors that are driving current practices and defining quality-of-care measures for patients with early-stage disease are what future studies need to address.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisBrachytherapyCombined Modality TherapyEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsUnited StatesAdjuvant radiationClinical guidelinesEarly-stage endometrial cancerIntermediate riskVaginal brachytherapy

Identifiers

PMID24821823
PMCPMC4041674
OpenAlexW2167121221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.