Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24821781›Full record

Trial reportProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Redemption of autoantibodies on anergic B cells by variable-region glycosylation and mutation away from self-reactivity.

Zahra Sabouri, Peter Schofield, Keisuke Horikawa, Emily Spierings, David Kipling, Katrina L Randall, David Langley, Brendan Roome, Rodrigo Vazquez-Lombardi, Romain Rouet and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 162 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
162citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

162 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 236 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

102 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Zahra SabouriDepartment of Immunology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia;
Peter SchofieldImmunology Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research and.
Keisuke HorikawaDepartment of Immunology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia;
Emily SpieringsDepartment of Immunology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia;
David KiplingInstitute of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4XN, United Kingdom; and.
Katrina L RandallDepartment of Immunology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia;
David LangleyImmunology Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research and.
Brendan RoomeImmunology Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research and.
Rodrigo Vazquez-LombardiImmunology Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research and.
Romain RouetImmunology Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4210-9613
Jana HermesImmunology Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research and.
Tyani D ChanImmunology Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research andSt Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia;
Robert BrinkImmunology Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research andSt Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia;
Deborah K Dunn-WaltersDepartment of Immunobiology, King's College London School of Medicine, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Daniel ChristImmunology Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research andSt Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia; d.christ@garvan.org.au chris.goodnow@anu.edu.au.
Christopher C GoodnowDepartment of Immunology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; d.christ@garvan.org.au chris.goodnow@anu.edu.au.
Australian National University · AUUNSW Sydney · AUGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AUSt Vincent's Clinic · AUCardiff University · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L01257X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The best-understood mechanisms for achieving antibody self/non-self discrimination discard self-reactive antibodies before they can be tested for binding microbial antigens, potentially creating holes in the repertoire. Here we provide evidence for a complementary mechanism: retaining autoantibodies in the repertoire displayed as low levels of IgM and high IgD on anergic B cells, masking a varying proportion of autoantibody-binding sites with carbohydrates, and removing their self-reactivity by somatic hypermutation and selection in germinal centers (GCs). Analysis of human antibody sequences by deep sequencing of isotype-switched memory B cells or in IgG antibodies elicited against allogeneic RhD+ erythrocytes, vaccinia virus, rotavirus, or tetanus toxoid provides evidence for reactivation of anergic IgM(low) IgD+ IGHV4-34+ B cells and removal of cold agglutinin self-reactivity by hypermutation, often accompanied by mutations that inactivated an N-linked glycosylation sequon in complementarity-determining region 2 (CDR2). In a Hy10 antibody transgenic model where anergic B cells respond to a biophysically defined lysozyme epitope displayed on both foreign and self-antigens, cell transfers revealed that anergic IgM(low) IgD+ B cells form twice as many GC progeny as naïve IgM(hi) IgD+ counterparts. Their GC progeny were rapidly selected for CDR2 mutations that blocked 72% of antigen-binding sites with N-linked glycan, decreased affinity 100-fold, and then cleared the binding sites of blocking glycan. These results provide evidence for a mechanism to acquire self/non-self discrimination by somatic mutation away from self-reactivity, and reveal how varying the efficiency of N-glycosylation provides a mechanism to modulate antibody avidity.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAutoantibodiesB-LymphocytesClonal AnergyFemaleGerminal CenterGlycosylationHumansImmunoglobulin DImmunoglobulin MImmunoglobulin Variable RegionMaleAutoantibodiesImmunoglobulin DImmunoglobulin MImmunoglobulin Variable Regionaffinity maturationautoimmunityclonal selectionself-tolerance

Identifiers

PMID24821781
PMCPMC4078846
OpenAlexW2110311209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.