Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24821680›Full record

Observational studyArthritis care & research2014

Time trends in glucocorticoid use in rheumatoid arthritis: results from a population-based inception cohort, 1980-1994 versus 1995-2007.

Ashima Makol, John M Davis, Cynthia S Crowson, Terry M Therneau, Sherine E Gabriel, Eric L Matteson

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Arthritis care & research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashima MakolMayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
John M Davis
Cynthia S Crowson
Terry M Therneau
Sherine E Gabriel
Eric L Matteson
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesUL1TR000135 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$41.2M
HEART DISEASE IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITISR01AR046849 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CROWSON, CYNTHIA S · 2000 to 2022
$11.3M
Rochester Epidemiology ProjectR01AG034676 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROCCA, WALTER A, ST SAUVER, JENNIFER LYNN · 2010 to 2019
$9.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000135NCATS NIH HHS UL1-TR000135NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR046849NIAMS NIH HHS R01-AR-46849NIA NIH HHS AG-034676NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine trends in glucocorticoid (GC) use and dosing among patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over time.

methodsA population-based inception cohort of RA patients diagnosed during 1980-2007 was followed longitudinally through their medical records until death, migration, or December 31, 2008. GC start and stop dates were collected, along with doses in prednisone equivalents.

resultsThe study population comprised 349 patients (68% women) diagnosed in 1980-1994 and 464 (69% women) diagnosed in 1995-2007, with a median followup of 15.3 and 5.7 years, respectively. A higher proportion of patients started GCs in their first year of disease in 1995-2007 (68% versus 36%; P < 0.001), but the starting dose (mean 8.7 versus 10.3 mg; P = 0.08) and cumulative dose in the first year of use (mean 1.8g [mean daily dose 4.9 mg] versus 2.1 gm [mean daily dose 5.8 mg]; P = 0.48) were not different. A higher proportion also discontinued GCs in their first year of disease in the 1995-2007 cohort (P < 0.001). These differences in GC initiation and discontinuation persisted throughout followup. Prevalence of GC use was higher in the 1995-2007 cohort for the first 3 years of disease.

conclusionMore patients are starting GCs early in their disease course now compared to previously, which is consistent with established treatment guidelines. A higher proportion are also discontinuing GCs, but the proportion of patients taking GCs at any given point of disease during the first 4 years is higher now than previously. Despite early addition of a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, some patients may not be able to discontinue GCs over the long term.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArthritis, RheumatoidDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Utilization ReviewFemaleGlucocorticoidsGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinnesotaPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Remission InductionRetrospective StudiesGlucocorticoids

Identifiers

PMID24821680
PMCPMC4177279
OpenAlexW2164895244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.