Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24821630›Full record

ArticleAccident; analysis and prevention2014

Pedestrian signalization and the risk of pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions in Lima, Peru.

D Alex Quistberg, Thomas D Koepsell, Linda Ng Boyle, J Jaime Miranda, Brian D Johnston, Beth E Ebel

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Accident; analysis and prevention, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Leveraging computer vision for predicting collision risks: a cross-sectional analysis of 2019-2021 fatal collisions in the USA.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Road Traffic Injuries and the Built Environment in Bogotá, Colombia, 2015-2019: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Bus stops and pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions in Lima, Peru: a matched case-control study.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D Alex QuistbergHarborview Injury Prevention & Research Center, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Ave, Box 359960, Seattle, WA 98104-2499, USA; Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., Box 356320, Seattle, WA 98195-6320, USA; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., Box 357236, Seattle, WA 98195-7236, USA. Electronic address: aquistbe@uw.edu.
Thomas D KoepsellHarborview Injury Prevention & Research Center, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Ave, Box 359960, Seattle, WA 98104-2499, USA; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., Box 357236, Seattle, WA 98195-7236, USA.
Linda Ng BoyleHarborview Injury Prevention & Research Center, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Ave, Box 359960, Seattle, WA 98104-2499, USA; Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Washington, Box 352650, Seattle, WA 98195-2650, USA.
J Jaime MirandaSchool of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Av. Honorio Delgado 430, Urb. Ingeniería, San Martin de Porres, Lima, Peru; CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Av. Armendáriz 497, 2do Piso, Miraflores, Lima, Peru.
Brian D JohnstonHarborview Injury Prevention & Research Center, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Ave, Box 359960, Seattle, WA 98104-2499, USA; Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., Box 356320, Seattle, WA 98195-6320, USA.
Beth E EbelHarborview Injury Prevention & Research Center, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Ave, Box 359960, Seattle, WA 98104-2499, USA; Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., Box 356320, Seattle, WA 98195-6320, USA; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., Box 357236, Seattle, WA 98195-7236, USA; Seattle Children's Hospital and Seattle Children's Research Institute, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.

Funding

Pediatric Injury Research Training ProgramT32HD057822 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CAROLYN A MC CARTY, Ali Rowhani-Rahbar · 2010 to 2026
$4.0M
NICHD NIH HHS 5T32HD057822NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD057822PHS HHS 268200900033C-1-0-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safe walking environments are essential for protecting pedestrians and promoting physical activity. In Peru, pedestrians comprise over three-quarters of road fatality victims. Pedestrian signalization plays an important role managing pedestrian and vehicle traffic and may help improve pedestrian safety. We examined the relationship between pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions and the presence of visible traffic signals, pedestrian signals, and signal timing to determine whether these countermeasures improved pedestrian safety. A matched case-control design was used where the units of study were crossing locations. We randomly sampled 97 control-matched collisions (weighted N=1134) at intersections occurring from October, 2010 to January, 2011 in Lima. Each case-control pair was matched on proximity, street classification, and number of lanes. Sites were visited between February, 2011 and September, 2011. Each analysis accounted for sampling weight and matching and was adjusted for vehicle and pedestrian traffic flow, crossing width, and mean vehicle speed. Collisions were more common where a phased pedestrian signal (green or red-light signal) was present compared to no signalization (odds ratio [OR] 8.88, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.32-59.6). A longer pedestrian-specific signal duration was associated with collision risk (OR 5.31, 95% CI 1.02-9.60 per 15-s interval). Collisions occurred more commonly in the presence of any signalization visible to pedestrians or pedestrian-specific signalization, though these associations were not statistically significant. Signalization efforts were not associated with lower risk for pedestrians; rather, they were associated with an increased risk of pedestrian-vehicle collisions.

Indexed as

CitiesEnvironment DesignWalkingAccident PreventionAccidents, TrafficAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleBuilt environmentPedestrian-motor vehicle collisionsPedestriansPedestrian signalsPeruTraffic signals

Identifiers

PMID24821630
PMCPMC4097079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.