Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24821532›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2014

Visualizing simulated electrical fields from electroencephalography and transcranial electric brain stimulation: a comparative evaluation.

Sebastian Eichelbaum, Moritz Dannhauer, Mario Hlawitschka, Dana Brooks, Thomas R Knösche, Gerik Scheuermann

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluating Current Density Modeling of Non-Invasive Eye and Brain Electrical Stimulation Using Phosphene Thresholds.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of Numerical Techniques for Solving the Current Injection Problem in Biological Tissues.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sebastian EichelbaumImage and Signal Processing Group, Leipzig University, Augustusplatz 10-11, 04109 Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: eichelbaum@informatik.uni-leipzig.de.
Moritz DannhauerScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, 72S. Central Campus Drive, 84112 Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Center for Integrative Biomedical Computing, University of Utah, 72S. Central Campus Drive, 84112, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: moritz@sci.utah.edu.
Mario HlawitschkaScientific Visualization, Leipzig University, Augustusplatz 10-11, 04109 Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: hlawitschka@informatik.uni-leipzig.de.
Dana BrooksCenter for Integrative Biomedical Computing, University of Utah, 72S. Central Campus Drive, 84112, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: brooks@ece.neu.edu.
Thomas R KnöscheHuman Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Institute, Stephanstraße 1a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: knoesche@cbs.mpg.de.
Gerik ScheuermannImage and Signal Processing Group, Leipzig University, Augustusplatz 10-11, 04109 Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: scheuermann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de.

Funding

TRD - VisualizationP41GM103545 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER R., MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2012 to 2019
$9.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103545NIGMS NIH HHS P41GM103545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical activity of neuronal populations is a crucial aspect of brain activity. This activity is not measured directly but recorded as electrical potential changes using head surface electrodes (electroencephalogram - EEG). Head surface electrodes can also be deployed to inject electrical currents in order to modulate brain activity (transcranial electric stimulation techniques) for therapeutic and neuroscientific purposes. In electroencephalography and noninvasive electric brain stimulation, electrical fields mediate between electrical signal sources and regions of interest (ROI). These fields can be very complicated in structure, and are influenced in a complex way by the conductivity profile of the human head. Visualization techniques play a central role to grasp the nature of those fields because such techniques allow for an effective conveyance of complex data and enable quick qualitative and quantitative assessments. The examination of volume conduction effects of particular head model parameterizations (e.g., skull thickness and layering), of brain anomalies (e.g., holes in the skull, tumors), location and extent of active brain areas (e.g., high concentrations of current densities) and around current injecting electrodes can be investigated using visualization. Here, we evaluate a number of widely used visualization techniques, based on either the potential distribution or on the current-flow. In particular, we focus on the extractability of quantitative and qualitative information from the obtained images, their effective integration of anatomical context information, and their interaction. We present illustrative examples from clinically and neuroscientifically relevant cases and discuss the pros and cons of the various visualization techniques.

Indexed as

Medical IllustrationComputer GraphicsElectroencephalographyHumansTranscranial Direct Current StimulationBioelectric FieldEEGHuman BraintDCSVisualization

Identifiers

PMID24821532
PMCPMC4172355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.