ArticleNeuroImage2014
Visualizing simulated electrical fields from electroencephalography and transcranial electric brain stimulation: a comparative evaluation.
Article in NeuroImage, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alternating Current Stimulation for Vision Restoration after Optic Nerve Damage: A Randomized Clinical Trial.PloS one · 2016Trial
- High frequency conductivity decomposition by solving physically constraint underdetermined inverse problem in human brain.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Decomposition of high-frequency electrical conductivity into extracellular and intracellular compartments based on two-compartment model using low-to-high multi-b diffusion MRI.Biomedical engineering online · 2021Article
- Evaluating Current Density Modeling of Non-Invasive Eye and Brain Electrical Stimulation Using Phosphene Thresholds.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2021Article
- High-frequency conductivity at Larmor-frequency in human brain using moving local window multilayer perceptron neural network.PloS one · 2021Article
- Forward and inverse effects of the complete electrode model in neonatal EEG.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- Optimization of focality and direction in dense electrode array transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).Journal of neural engineering · 2016Article
- Evaluation of Numerical Techniques for Solving the Current Injection Problem in Biological Tissues.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2016Article
- Improving Interference Control in ADHD Patients with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2016Article
- Impact of uncertain head tissue conductivity in the optimization of transcranial direct current stimulation for an auditory target.Journal of neural engineering · 2015Article
- Localizing movement-related primary sensorimotor cortices with multi-band EEG frequency changes and functional MRI.PloS one · 2014Article
- Age-related episodic memory decline and the role of amyloid-β: a systematic review.Dementia & neuropsychologiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrical activity of neuronal populations is a crucial aspect of brain activity. This activity is not measured directly but recorded as electrical potential changes using head surface electrodes (electroencephalogram - EEG). Head surface electrodes can also be deployed to inject electrical currents in order to modulate brain activity (transcranial electric stimulation techniques) for therapeutic and neuroscientific purposes. In electroencephalography and noninvasive electric brain stimulation, electrical fields mediate between electrical signal sources and regions of interest (ROI). These fields can be very complicated in structure, and are influenced in a complex way by the conductivity profile of the human head. Visualization techniques play a central role to grasp the nature of those fields because such techniques allow for an effective conveyance of complex data and enable quick qualitative and quantitative assessments. The examination of volume conduction effects of particular head model parameterizations (e.g., skull thickness and layering), of brain anomalies (e.g., holes in the skull, tumors), location and extent of active brain areas (e.g., high concentrations of current densities) and around current injecting electrodes can be investigated using visualization. Here, we evaluate a number of widely used visualization techniques, based on either the potential distribution or on the current-flow. In particular, we focus on the extractability of quantitative and qualitative information from the obtained images, their effective integration of anatomical context information, and their interaction. We present illustrative examples from clinically and neuroscientifically relevant cases and discuss the pros and cons of the various visualization techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.