Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24821410›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

De novo transcriptome assembly and analyses of gene expression during photomorphogenesis in diploid wheat Triticum monococcum.

Samuel E Fox, Matthew Geniza, Mamatha Hanumappa, Sushma Naithani, Chris Sullivan, Justin Preece, Vijay K Tiwari, Justin Elser, Jeffrey M Leonard, Abigail Sage and 7 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. High-resolution mapping of SrTm4, a recessive resistance gene to wheat stem rust.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  5. Insights into FourInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. FISH karyotype comparison between AJournal of applied genetics · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Role ofFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Development of a New AThe plant genome · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Samuel E FoxDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
Matthew GenizaDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America; Molecular and Cellular Biology Graduate Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
Mamatha HanumappaDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
Sushma NaithaniDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America; Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
Chris SullivanDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America; Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
Justin PreeceDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
Vijay K TiwariDepartment of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
Justin ElserDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
Jeffrey M LeonardDepartment of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
Abigail SageDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
Cathy GreshamInstitute for Genomics, Biocomputing and Biotechnology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, United States of America.
Arnaud KerhornouEuropean Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Dan BolserEuropean Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Fiona McCarthySchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Paul KerseyEuropean Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Gerard R LazoUSDA-ARS, Western Regional Research Center, Albany, California, United States of America.
Pankaj JaiswalDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America; Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
Oregon State University · USEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBMississippi State University · USUniversity of Arizona · USWestern Regional Research Center · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J003743/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTriticum monococcum (2n) is a close ancestor of T. urartu, the A-genome progenitor of cultivated hexaploid wheat, and is therefore a useful model for the study of components regulating photomorphogenesis in diploid wheat. In order to develop genetic and genomic resources for such a study, we constructed genome-wide transcriptomes of two Triticum monococcum subspecies, the wild winter wheat T. monococcum ssp. aegilopoides (accession G3116) and the domesticated spring wheat T. monococcum ssp. monococcum (accession DV92) by generating de novo assemblies of RNA-Seq data derived from both etiolated and green seedlings. PRINCIPAL

findingsThe de novo transcriptome assemblies of DV92 and G3116 represent 120,911 and 117,969 transcripts, respectively. We successfully mapped ∼90% of these transcripts from each accession to barley and ∼95% of the transcripts to T. urartu genomes. However, only ∼77% transcripts mapped to the annotated barley genes and ∼85% transcripts mapped to the annotated T. urartu genes. Differential gene expression analyses revealed 22% more light up-regulated and 35% more light down-regulated transcripts in the G3116 transcriptome compared to DV92. The DV92 and G3116 mRNA sequence reads aligned against the reference barley genome led to the identification of ∼500,000 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and ∼22,000 simple sequence repeat (SSR) sites.

conclusionsDe novo transcriptome assemblies of two accessions of the diploid wheat T. monococcum provide new empirical transcriptome references for improving Triticeae genome annotations, and insights into transcriptional programming during photomorphogenesis. The SNP and SSR sites identified in our analysis provide additional resources for the development of molecular markers.

Indexed as

DiploidyGenome, PlantSeedlingsTranscriptomeTriticum

Identifiers

PMID24821410
PMCPMC4018402
OpenAlexW2026952932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.