Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24821138›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

How the venom from the ectoparasitoid Wasp nasonia vitripennis exhibits anti-inflammatory properties on mammalian cell lines.

Ellen L Danneels, Sarah Gerlo, Karen Heyninck, Kathleen Van Craenenbroeck, Karolien De Bosscher, Guy Haegeman, Dirk C de Graaf

Expression of concernOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Anti-inflammatory activities of arthropod peptides: a systematic review.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Harnessing the naturalCurrent opinion in insect science · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ellen L DanneelsLaboratory of Zoophysiology, Department of Physiology, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Sarah GerloVIB Department of Medical Protein Research, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Karen HeyninckLaboratory for Eukaryotic Gene Expression and Signal Transduction, Department of Physiology, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Kathleen Van CraenenbroeckLaboratory for Eukaryotic Gene Expression and Signal Transduction, Department of Physiology, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Karolien De BosscherVIB Department of Medical Protein Research, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Guy HaegemanLaboratory for Eukaryotic Gene Expression and Signal Transduction, Department of Physiology, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Dirk C de GraafLaboratory of Zoophysiology, Department of Physiology, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Ghent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With more than 150,000 species, parasitoids are a large group of hymenopteran insects that inject venom into and then lay their eggs in or on other insects, eventually killing the hosts. Their venoms have evolved into different mechanisms for manipulating host immunity, physiology and behavior in such a way that enhance development of the parasitoid young. The venom from the ectoparasitoid Nasonia vitripennis inhibits the immune system in its host organism in order to protect their offspring from elimination. Since the major innate immune pathways in insects, the Toll and Imd pathways, are homologous to the NF-κB pathway in mammals, we were interested in whether a similar immune suppression seen in insects could be elicited in a mammalian cell system. A well characterized NF-κB reporter gene assay in fibrosarcoma cells showed a dose-dependent inhibition of NF-κB signaling caused by the venom. In line with this NF-κB inhibitory action, N. vitripennis venom dampened the expression of IL-6, a prototypical proinflammatory cytokine, from LPS-treated macrophages. The venom also inhibited the expression of two NF-κB target genes, IκBα and A20, that act in a negative feedback loop to prevent excessive NF-κB activity. Surprisingly, we did not detect any effect of the venom on the early events in the canonical NF-κB activation pathway, leading to NF-κB nuclear translocation, which was unaltered in venom-treated cells. The MAP kinases ERK, p38 and JNK are other crucial regulators of immune responses. We observed that venom treatment did not affect p38 and ERK activation, but induced a prolonged JNK activation. In summary, our data indicate that venom from N. vitripennis inhibits NF-κB signaling in mammalian cells. We identify venom-induced up regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor-regulated GILZ as a most likely molecular mediator for this inhibition.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBlotting, WesternCell LineHumansInterleukin-6LipopolysaccharidesMacrophagesMiceNF-kappa Bp38 Mitogen-Activated Protein KinasesSignal TransductionVenomsWaspsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsInterleukin-6LipopolysaccharidesNF-kappa Bp38 Mitogen-Activated Protein KinasesVenoms

Identifiers

PMID24821138
PMCPMC4018385
OpenAlexW2152205705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.