ArticleJAMA pediatrics2014
Rates of adverse events associated with male circumcision in U.S. medical settings, 2001 to 2010.
Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for management of urinary tract infection and primary vesicoureteric reflux.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Guideline
- Critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision: A systematic review.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Incorporation of Social Determinants of Health in the Peer-Reviewed Literature: A Systematic Review of Articles Authored by the National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Pooled it
- Adult male circumcision with a circular stapler versus conventional circumcision: A prospective randomized clinical trial.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2015Trial
- Does the evidence support circumcision of infant males in the United Kingdom?-a systematic review.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- Voluntary male medical circumcision of pre-school-aged boys in primary care.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025Article
- Complications Associated With Circumcision in a Community-Based Hospital.PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) · 2025Article
- Clinical outcomes of circumcisions and prevalence of complications of male circumcisions: A five-year retrospective analysis at a teaching hospital in Ghana.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Comparing Penile Problems in Circumcised vs. Uncircumcised Boys: Insights From a Large Commercial Claims Database With a Focus on Provider Type Performing Circumcision.Journal of pediatric surgery · 2024Article
- Surgical repair of extensive penile shaft skin injuries following neonatal circumcision.Urology case reports · 2024Article
- Detrimental to public health: Royal Australasian College of Physicians' recent policy on infant circumcision.Pediatric research · 2024Article
- Characteristics and management of post-circumcision Urethrocutaneous Fistula: a retrospective study in surgical units in Cameroon.BJUI compass · 2024Article
- Neonatal Male Circumcision: Clearly Beneficial for Public Health or an Ethical Dilemma? A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Comments by opponents on the British Medical Association's guidance on non-therapeutic male circumcision of children seem one-sided and may undermine public health.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2023Article
- Novoglan device for treatment of adult phimosis: Novoglan-01 open-label clinical trial on safety, efficacy and tolerability.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Article
- Reply to Morris et al. re: 'The medical evidence on non-therapeutic circumcision of infants and boys-setting the record straight'.International journal of impotence research · 2023Article
- Re: The medical evidence on non-therapeutic circumcision of infants and boys-setting the record straight.International journal of impotence research · 2023Article
- A comprehensive comparison of the early and late complications of surgical circumcision in neonates and children: A cohort study.Health science reports · 2022Article
- Evidence-based circumcision policy for Australia.Journal of men's health · 2022Article
- Decision-Making Regarding Newborn Circumcision: A Qualitative Analysis.Maternal and child health journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byIn reply.2014
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceApproximately 1.4 million male circumcisions (MCs) are performed annually in US medical settings. However, population-based estimates of MC-associated adverse events (AEs) are lacking.
objectivesTo estimate the incidence rate of MC-associated AEs and to assess whether AE rates differed by age at circumcision.
designWe selected 41 possible MC AEs based on a literature review and on medical billing codes. We estimated a likely risk window for the incidence calculation for each MC AE based on pathogenesis. We used 2001 to 2010 data from SDI Health, a large administrative claims data set, to conduct a retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND
participantsSDI Health provided administrative claims data from inpatient and outpatient US medical settings. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: For each AE, we calculated the incidence per million MCs. We compared the incidence risk ratio and the incidence rate difference for circumcised vs uncircumcised newborn males and for males circumcised at younger than 1 year, age 1 to 9 years, or 10 years or older. An AE was considered probably related to MC if the incidence risk ratio significantly exceeded 1 at P < .05 or occurred only in circumcised males.
resultsRecords were available for 1,400,920 circumcised males, 93.3% as newborns. Of 41 possible MC AEs, 16 (39.0%) were probable. The incidence of total MC AEs was slightly less than 0.5%. Rates of potentially serious MC AEs ranged from 0.76 (95% CI, 0.10-5.43) per million MCs for stricture of male genital organs to 703.23 (95% CI, 659.22-750.18) per million MCs for repair of incomplete circumcision. Compared with boys circumcised at younger than 1 year, the incidences of probable AEs were approximately 20-fold and 10-fold greater for males circumcised at age 1 to 9 years and at 10 years or older, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Male circumcision had a low incidence of AEs overall, especially if the procedure was performed during the first year of life, but rose 10-fold to 20-fold when performed after infancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.