Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24820732›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2014

New daily persistent headache: an update.

Todd D Rozen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Post-COVID-19 headache- NDPH phenotype: a systematic review of case reports.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Is new daily persistent headache a fallout of somatization? An observational study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Observational
  6. New Daily Persistent Headache: a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Odyssey.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Update on New Daily Persistent Headache.Current treatment options in neurology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Todd D RozenDepartment of Neurology, Geisinger Health System- Geisinger Wyoming Valley, MC 37-31, 1000 E. Mountain Drive, Wilkes-Barre, PA, 18711, USA, tdrozmigraine@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New daily persistent headache is a primary headache disorder marked by a unique temporal profile which is daily from onset. For many sufferers this is their first ever headache. Very little is known about the pathogenesis of this condition. It might be a disorder of abnormal glial activation with persistent central nervous system inflammation and it may be a syndrome that occurs in individuals who have a history of cervical hypermobility. At present there is no known specific treatment and many patients go for years to decades without any improvement in their condition despite aggressive therapy. This article will present an up-to-date overview of new daily persistent headache on the topics of clinical presentation, treatment, diagnostic criteria, and presumed pathogenesis. It will also provide some of the authors own treatment suggestions based on recognized triggering events and some suggestions for future clinical trials.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdrenal Cortex HormonesAge of OnsetAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsDoxycyclineHeadache DisordersHumansMexiletineSeverity of Illness IndexSex DistributionTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsDoxycyclineMexiletineTNF protein, humanTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.