Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24820445›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2014

An assessment of patient navigator activities in breast cancer patient navigation programs using a nine-principle framework.

Christine M Gunn, Jack A Clark, Tracy A Battaglia, Karen M Freund, Victoria A Parker

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Coordination Models for Cancer Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Assessment of patient navigation programs for breast cancer patients across the city of Boston.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A mixed-methods process evaluation of Family Navigation implementation for autism spectrum disorder.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2019
    Article
  13. In their own words: patient navigator roles in culturally sensitive cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Efficacy of the Competency-Based Oncology Patient Navigator Training.Journal of oncology navigation & survivorship · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cancer and Employment Issues: Perspectives from Cancer Patient Navigators.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christine M GunnDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Women's Health Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Jack A Clark
Tracy A Battaglia
Karen M Freund
Victoria A Parker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine how closely a published model of navigation reflects the practice of navigation in breast cancer patient navigation programs. DATA SOURCE: Observational field notes describing patient navigator activities collected from 10 purposefully sampled, foundation-funded breast cancer navigation programs in 2008-2009. STUDY

designAn exploratory study evaluated a model framework for patient navigation published by Harold Freeman by using an a priori coding scheme based on model domains. DATA COLLECTION: Field notes were compiled and coded. Inductive codes were added during analysis to characterize activities not included in the original model. PRINCIPAL

findingsPrograms were consistent with individual-level principles representing tasks focused on individual patients. There was variation with respect to program-level principles that related to program organization and structure. Program characteristics such as the use of volunteer or clinical navigators were identified as contributors to patterns of model concordance.

conclusionsThis research provides a framework for defining the navigator role as focused on eliminating barriers through the provision of individual-level interventions. The diversity observed at the program level in these programs was a reflection of implementation according to target population. Further guidance may be required to assist patient navigation programs to define and tailor goals and measurement to community needs.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCase ManagementFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePatient Education as TopicPatient NavigationUnited Statesbreast cancerdisparitiespatient-centered carePatient navigation

Identifiers

PMID24820445
PMCPMC4213049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.