Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24820053›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2014

Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Device Independent Intraretinal Layer Segmentation.

Alexander Ehnes, Yaroslava Wenner, Christoph Friedburg, Markus N Preising, Wadim Bowl, Walter Sekundo, Erdmuthe Meyer Zu Bexten, Knut Stieger, Birgit Lorenz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Normative values of peripheral retinal thickness measured with Spectralis OCT in healthy young adults.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexander EhnesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany ; Department of Medical Informatics, University of Applied Sciences, Giessen, Germany.
Yaroslava WennerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany ; Department of Ophthalmology, Phillips University, Marburg, Germany.
Christoph FriedburgDepartment of Ophthalmology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
Markus N PreisingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
Wadim BowlDepartment of Ophthalmology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
Walter SekundoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Phillips University, Marburg, Germany.
Erdmuthe Meyer Zu BextenDepartment of Medical Informatics, University of Applied Sciences, Giessen, Germany.
Knut StiegerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
Birgit LorenzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop and test an algorithm to segment intraretinal layers irrespectively of the actual Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) device used.

methodsThe developed algorithm is based on the graph theory optimization. The algorithm's performance was evaluated against that of three expert graders for unsigned boundary position difference and thickness measurement of a retinal layer group in 50 and 41 B-scans, respectively. Reproducibility of the algorithm was tested in 30 C-scans of 10 healthy subjects each with the Spectralis and the Stratus OCT. Comparability between different devices was evaluated in 84 C-scans (volume or radial scans) obtained from 21 healthy subjects, two scans per subject with the Spectralis OCT, and one scan per subject each with the Stratus OCT and the RTVue-100 OCT. Each C-scan was segmented and the mean thickness for each retinal layer in sections of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) grid was measured.

resultsThe algorithm was able to segment up to 11 intraretinal layers. Measurements with the algorithm were within the 95% confidence interval of a single grader and the difference was smaller than the interindividual difference between the expert graders themselves. The cross-device examination of ETDRS-grid related layer thicknesses highly agreed between the three OCT devices. The algorithm correctly segmented a C-scan of a patient with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa.

conclusionsThe segmentation software provides device-independent, reliable, and reproducible analysis of intraretinal layers, similar to what is obtained from expert graders. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Potential application of the software includes routine clinical practice and multicenter clinical trials.

Indexed as

graph theory optimizationoptical coherence tomographyretinaretinal layer segmentation

Identifiers

PMID24820053
PMCPMC3922027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.