Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24820003›Full record

ArticleMidwifery2014

Survey of women's experiences of care in a new freestanding midwifery unit in an inner city area of London, England. 1: Methods and women's overall ratings of care.

Alison J Macfarlane, Lucia Rocca-Ihenacho, Lyle R Turner, Carolyn Roth

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Midwifery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alison J MacfarlaneCity University London, UK. Electronic address: A.J.Macfarlane@city.ac.uk.
Lucia Rocca-IhenachoBarts Health NHS Trust, UK.
Lyle R TurnerCity University London, UK.
Carolyn RothUniversity of Keele, UK.
City, University of London · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBKeele University · GB

Funding

Department of Health CDRF 2009-24Department of Health PB-PG-0107-12209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto describe and compare women's choices and experiences of maternity care before and after the opening of the Barkantine Birth Centre, a new freestanding midwifery unit in an inner city area.

designtelephone surveys undertaken in late pregnancy and about six weeks after birth in two separate time periods, Phase 1 before the birth centre opened and Phase 2 after it had opened.

settingTower Hamlets, a deprived inner city borough in east London, England, 2007-2010.

participants620 women who were resident in Tower Hamlets and who satisfied the Barts and the London NHS Trust's eligibility criteria for using the birth centre. Of these, 259 women were recruited to Phase 1 and 361 to Phase 2. MEASUREMENTS AND

findingswomen who satisfied the criteria for birth centre care and who booked antenatally for care at the birth centre were significantly more likely to rate their care as good or very good overall than corresponding women who also satisfied these criteria but booked initially at the hospital. Women who started labour care in spontaneous labour at the birth centre were significantly more likely to be cared for by a midwife they had already met, have one to one care in labour and have the same midwife with them throughout their labour. They were also significantly more likely to report that the staff were kind and understanding, that they were treated with respect and dignity and that their privacy was respected. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: this survey in an inner city area showed that women who chose the freestanding midwifery unit care had positive experiences to report. Taken together with the findings of the Birthplace Programme, it adds further weight to the evidence in support of freestanding midwifery unit care for women without obstetric complications.

Indexed as

Birthing CentersMidwiferyPatient SatisfactionUrban Health ServicesAdolescentAdultEnglandFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansParturitionPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBirth centreFree-standing midwifery unitMidwifery careService users׳ views

Identifiers

PMID24820003
PMCPMC4157326
OpenAlexW2107478964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.