Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24819820›Full record

SynthesisProgress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry2014

Effects of antipsychotic D2 antagonists on long-term potentiation in animals and implications for human studies.

Rae Price, Bahar Salavati, Ariel Graff-Guerrero, Daniel M Blumberger, Benoit H Mulsant, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Tarek K Rajji

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Effect fingerprints of antipsychotic drugs on neural networks in vitro.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rae PriceInstitute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada; Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.
Bahar SalavatiInstitute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada; Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.
Ariel Graff-GuerreroInstitute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada; Geriatric Psychiatry Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.
Daniel M BlumbergerInstitute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada; Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Geriatric Psychiatry Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.
Benoit H MulsantInstitute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada; Geriatric Psychiatry Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.
Zafiris J DaskalakisInstitute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada; Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.
Tarek K RajjiInstitute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada; Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Geriatric Psychiatry Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: Tarek.Rajji@camh.ca.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Optimal Dosing of Antipsychotic Drugs in Late LifeR01MH084886 · NIMH · CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH · PI MAMO, DAVID · 2010 to 2014
$761k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In people with schizophrenia, cognitive abilities - including memory - are strongly associated with functional outcome. Long-term potentiation (LTP) is a form of neuroplasticity that is believed to be the physiological basis for memory. It has been postulated that antipsychotic medication can impair long-term potentiation and cognition by altering dopaminergic transmission. Thus, a systematic review was performed in order to assess the relationship between antipsychotics and D2 antagonists on long-term potentiation. The majority of studies on LTP and antipsychotics have found that acute administration of antipsychotics was associated with impairments in LTP in wild-type animals. In contrast, chronic administration and acute antipsychotics in animal models of schizophrenia were not. Typical and atypical antipsychotics and other D2 antagonists behaved similarly, with the exception of clozapine and olanzapine. Clozapine caused potentiation independent of tetanization, while olanzapine facilitated tetanus-induced potentiation. These studies are limited in their ability to model the effects of antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia as they were largely performed in wild-type animals as opposed to humans with schizophrenia, and assessed after acute rather than chronic treatment. Further studies using patients with schizophrenia receiving chronic antipsychotic treatment are needed to better understand the effects of these medications in this population.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntipsychotic AgentsDopamineDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsHumansLong-Term PotentiationSchizophreniaAntipsychotic AgentsDopamineDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsAnimalsAntipsychoticsD2HumansLTPNeurophysiology

Identifiers

PMID24819820
PMCPMC4138225
OpenAlexW1963593709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.