ArticleJAMA internal medicine2014
Impact of an intensive care unit telemedicine program on patient outcomes in an integrated health care system.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- [Telemedicine in the ICU - the possibilities and limitations of an innovation].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2016Pooled it
- Telemedicine with clinical decision support for critical care: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Telemedicine in adult intensive care: A systematic review of patient-relevant outcomes and methodological considerations.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Improving the Outcome of Sick Children Referred from District Hospitals in and around Puducherry by Establishing a Communication Network: A Community-based Quality Improvement Initiative.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
- Telemedicine Critical Care-Mediated Mortality Reductions in Lower-Performing Patient Diagnosis Groups: A Prospective, Before and After Study.Critical care explorations · 2023Observational
- An evaluation of the impact of the implementation of the Tele-ICU: a retrospective observational study.Journal of intensive care · 2023Article
- Outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest among hospitals with and without telemedicine critical care.Resuscitation · 2022Article
- Training of Pediatric Critical Care Providers in Developing Countries in Evidence Based Medicine Utilizing Remote Simulation Sessions.Global pediatric health · 2021Article
- Article
- Never Let a Crisis Go to Waste: Implementing Virtual Innovations During the COVID-19 Pandemic for a Better Tomorrow in Health Care.JACC. Case reports · 2020Article
- Telemedicine Coverage of Intensive Care Units: A Narrative Review.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2018Review
- Impact of Telemedicine on Mortality, Length of Stay, and Cost Among Patients in Progressive Care Units: Experience From a Large Healthcare System.Critical care medicine · 2018Observational
- Using electronic medical record notes to measure ICU telemedicine utilization.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Article
- Article
- [Current capabilities of telemedicine in anaesthesiology].Der Anaesthesist · 2015Review
- The RAFT Telemedicine Network: Lessons Learnt and Perspectives from a Decade of Educational and Clinical Services in Low- and Middle-Incomes Countries.Frontiers in public health · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceIntensive care unit (ICU) telemedicine (TM) programs have been promoted as improving access to intensive care specialists and ultimately improving patient outcomes, but data on effectiveness are limited and conflicting.
objectiveTo examine the impact of ICU TM on mortality rates and length of stay (LOS) in an integrated health care system. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsObservational pre-post study of patients treated in 8 "intervention" ICUs (7 hospitals within the US Department of Veterans Affairs health care system) during 2011-2012 that implemented TM monitoring during the post-TM period as well as patients treated in concurrent control ICUs that did not implement an ICU TM program.
interventionImplementation of ICU TM monitoring. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Unadjusted and risk-adjusted ICU, in-hospital, and 30-day mortality rates and ICU and hospital LOS for patients who did or did not receive treatment in ICUs equipped with TM monitoring.
resultsOur study included 3355 patients treated in our intervention ICUs (1708 in the pre-TM period and 1647 in the post-TM period) and 3584 treated in the control ICUs during the same period. Patient demographics and comorbid illnesses were similar in the intervention and control ICUs during the pre-TM and post-TM periods; however, predicted ICU mortality rates were modestly lower for admissions to the intervention ICUs compared with control ICUs in both the pre-TM (3.0% vs 3.6%; P = .02) and post-TM (2.8% vs 3.5%; P < .001) periods. Implementation of ICU TM was not associated with a significant decline in ICU, in-hospital, or 30-day mortality rates or LOS in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. For example, unadjusted ICU mortality in the pre-TM vs post-TM periods were 2.9% vs 2.8% (P = .89) for the intervention ICUs and 4.0% vs 3.4% (P = .31) for the control ICUs. Unadjusted 30-day mortality during the pre-TM vs post-TM periods were 7.7% vs 7.8% (P = .91) for the intervention ICUs and 12.0% vs 10.2% (P = .08) for the control ICUs. Evaluation of interaction terms comparing the magnitude of mortality rate change during the pre-TM and post-TM periods in the intervention and control ICUs failed to demonstrate a significant reduction in mortality rates or LOS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We found no evidence that the implementation of ICU TM significantly reduced mortality rates or LOS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.