ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2014
Force-velocity relationship of leg extensors obtained from loaded and unloaded vertical jumps.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of countermovement depth on kinematic and kinetic patterns of maximum vertical jumps.Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology · 2015Trial
- The role of starting knee angle in squat jump force-velocity profiles: interactions with subjects' strength levels and imputed push-off distance.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Acute Effects of Short-Term Massage Procedures on Neuromechanical Contractile Properties of Rectus Femoris Muscle.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Exploring the Low Force-High Velocity Domain of the Force-Velocity Relationship in Acyclic Lower-Limb Extensions.Sports medicine - open · 2023Article
- Feasibility of the 2-point method to determine the load-velocity relationship variables during the countermovement jump exercise.Journal of sport and health science · 2023Article
- Force-Velocity Profile of Competitive Kayakers: Evaluation of a Novel Single Kayak Stroke Test.Journal of human kinetics · 2021Article
- Are the Parameters of Novel Two-Point Force-Velocity Model Generalizable in Leg Muscles?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Article
- Effects of Resistance Training With Constant, Inertial, and Combined Loads on Muscle Power and Strength Output.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Force-velocity profile during vertical jump cannot be assessed using only bodyweight jump and isometric maximal voluntary contraction tasks.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Differences in Utilization of Lower Limb Muscle Power in Squat Jump With Positive and Negative Load.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Relationship between Cyclic and Non-Cyclic Force-Velocity Characteristics in BMX Cyclists.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Is Test Standardization Important when Arm and Leg Muscle Mechanical Properties are Assessed through the Force-Velocity Relationship?Journal of human kinetics · 2019Article
- Force-Velocity Relationship in the Countermovement Jump Exercise Assessed by Different Measurement Methods.Journal of human kinetics · 2019Article
- On the Shape of the Force-Velocity Relationship in Skeletal Muscles: The Linear, the Hyperbolic, and the Double-Hyperbolic.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Review
- Assessment of the two-point method applied in field conditions for routine testing of muscle mechanical capacities in a leg cycle ergometer.European journal of applied physiology · 2018Article
- Article
- Methods of Power-Force-Velocity Profiling During Sprint Running: A Narrative Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017Review
- Muscle Force-Velocity Relationships Observed in Four Different Functional Tests.Journal of human kinetics · 2017Article
- Two-Load Method for Distinguishing Between Muscle Force, Velocity, and Power-Producing Capacities.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeResent research has suggested that loaded multi-joint movements could reveal a linear force-velocity (F-V) relationship. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the F-V relationship both across different types of vertical jumps and across different F and V variables.
methodsTen healthy subjects performed maximum various vertical jumps that were either loaded or unloaded by constant external forces of up to 30 % of their body weight. Both the maximum and averaged F and V data were recorded.
resultsThe observed F-V relationships proved to be strong (median correlation coefficients ranged 0.78-0.93) and quasi-linear. Their F- and V-intercepts and the calculated maximum power (P) were highly reliable (0.85 < ICC < 0.98), while their concurrent validity with respect to their directly measured values was on average moderate-to-large. The obtained F-V relationships also revealed that (1) the assessment of maximum F and P could be somewhat more reliable and valid than the assessment of maximum V, (2) natural countermovement jumps should be employed rather than the jumps performed from a fixed squat position, while (3) both maximum and averaged F and V variables could be used despite revealing markedly different regression parameters.
conclusionsThe data generally reveal a reliable, valid, strong and quasi-linear F-V relationship across variety of vertical jumps and the recorded F and V variables. Therefore, we conclude that the loaded vertical jumps could be developed into a routine method for testing the force, velocity, and power generating capacity of leg extensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.