Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24819339›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2014

Therapeutic use of botulinum toxin in migraine: mechanisms of action.

Roshni Ramachandran, Tony L Yaksh

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A proof-of-concept study on the effectiveness of botulinum toxin on spasticity plus syndrome in multiple sclerosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Migraine-Associated Otalgia: An Underappreciated Entity.Journal of audiology & otology · 2022
    Article
  14. The Multispecialty Toxin: A Literature Review of Botulinum Toxin.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Non-aesthetic uses of botulinum toxin in the head and neck.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Utilities of Botulinum Toxins in Dermatology and Cosmetology.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roshni RamachandranAnesthesiology Research, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Tony L Yaksh
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

The Pharmacology of Spinal AnalgesicsR01DA002110 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI YAKSH, TONY L. · 1985 to 2014
$3.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA002110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migraine pain represents sensations arising from the activation of trigeminal afferents, which innervate the meningeal vasculature and project to the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC). Pain secondary to meningeal input is referred to extracranial regions innervated by somatic afferents that project to homologous regions in the TNC. Such viscerosomatic convergence accounts for referral of migraine pain arising from meningeal afferents to particular extracranial dermatomes. Botulinum toxins (BoNTs) delivered into extracranial dermatomes are effective in and approved for treating chronic migraine pain. Aside from their well-described effect upon motor endplates, BoNTs are also taken up in local afferent nerve terminals where they cleave soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins, and prevent local terminal release. However, a local extracranial effect of BoNT cannot account for allthe effects of BoNT upon migraine. We now know that peripherally delivered BoNTs are taken up in sensory afferents and transported to cleave SNARE proteins in the ganglion and TNC, prevent evoked afferent release and downstream activation. Such effects upon somatic input (as from the face) likewise would not alone account for block of input from converging meningeal afferents. This current work suggests that BoNTs may undergo transcytosis to cleave SNAREs in second-order neurons or in adjacent afferent terminals. Finally, while SNAREs mediate exocytotic release, they are also involved in transport of channels and receptors involved in facilitated pain states. The role of such post-synaptic effects of BoNT action in migraine remains to be determined.

Indexed as

AnimalsBotulinum ToxinsHumansMigraine DisordersNeurons, AfferentPainSNARE ProteinsBotulinum ToxinsSNARE Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24819339
PMCPMC4241086
OpenAlexW1942357531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.