Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24819203›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect physiology2014

Single amino acids in sucrose rewards modulate feeding and associative learning in the honeybee.

Nicola K Simcock, Helen E Gray, Geraldine A Wright

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A matter of taste: the adverse effect of pollen compounds on the pre-ingestive gustatory experience of sugar solutions for honeybees.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Responsiveness to Sugar Solutions in the MothFrontiers in physiology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Remembering Components of Food in Drosophila.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicola K SimcockInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom.
Helen E GrayInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom.
Geraldine A WrightInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom. Electronic address: jeri.wright@ncl.ac.uk.
Newcastle University · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I000968/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obtaining the correct balance of nutrients requires that the brain integrates information about the body's nutritional state with sensory information from food to guide feeding behaviour. Learning is a mechanism that allows animals to identify cues associated with nutrients so that they can be located quickly when required. Feedback about nutritional state is essential for nutrient balancing and could influence learning. How specific this feedback is to individual nutrients has not often been examined. Here, we tested how the honeybee's nutritional state influenced the likelihood it would feed on and learn sucrose solutions containing single amino acids. Nutritional state was manipulated by pre-feeding bees with either 1M sucrose or 1M sucrose containing 100mM of isoleucine, proline, phenylalanine, or methionine 24h prior to olfactory conditioning of the proboscis extension response. We found that bees pre-fed sucrose solution consumed less of solutions containing amino acids and were also less likely to learn to associate amino acid solutions with odours. Unexpectedly, bees pre-fed solutions containing an amino acid were also less likely to learn to associate odours with sucrose the next day. Furthermore, they consumed more of and were more likely to learn when rewarded with an amino acid solution if they were pre-fed isoleucine and proline. Our data indicate that single amino acids at relatively high concentrations inhibit feeding on sucrose solutions containing them, and they can act as appetitive reinforcers during learning. Our data also suggest that select amino acids interact with mechanisms that signal nutritional sufficiency to reduce hunger. Based on these experiments, we predict that nutrient balancing for essential amino acids during learning requires integration of information about several amino acids experienced simultaneously.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAssociation LearningBeesAnimalsFeeding BehaviorSmellSucroseAmino AcidsSucroseAmino acidsGustationHoneybeeNutrient balancingOlfactory learning

Identifiers

PMID24819203
PMCPMC4194351
OpenAlexW2003098617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.