Trial reportPloS one2014
Emotional body-word conflict evokes enhanced n450 and slow potential.
Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- High social anxiety is associated with attenuated cognitive-control modulation in a mixed threat-neutral context: evidence from ERPs and time-frequency analysis.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Face expectancy cues differentially modulate conflict processing driven by emotional incongruence: an EEG study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sequential and domain-specific processing mechanisms for dual cognitive-emotional conflict.Psychological research · 2024Article
- The Affect Misattribution in the Interpretation of Ambiguous Stimuli in Terms of Warmth vs. Competence: Behavioral Phenomenon and Its Neural Correlates.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Arousal, subjective significance and the origin of valence aligned words in the processing of an emotional categorisation task.PloS one · 2022Article
- How the depth of processing modulates emotional interference - evidence from EEG and pupil diameter data.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2019Article
- How socioemotional setting modulates late-stage conflict resolution processes in the lateral prefrontal cortex.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2018Article
- Acute Exercise and Neurocognitive Development in Preadolescents and Young Adults: An ERP Study.Neural plasticity · 2017Article
- Emotional Modulation of Conflict Processing in the Affective Domain: Evidence from Event-related Potentials and Event-related Spectral Perturbation Analysis.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotional conflict refers to the influence of task irrelevant affective stimuli on current task set. Previously used emotional face-word tasks have produced certain electrophysiological phenomena, such as an enhanced N450 and slow potential; however, it remains unknown whether these effects emerge in other tasks. The present study used an emotional body-word conflict task to investigate the neural dynamics of emotional conflict as reflected by response time, accuracy, and event-related potentials, which were recorded with the aim of replicating the previously observed N450 and slow potential effect. Results indicated increased response time and decreased accuracy in the incongruent condition relative to the congruent condition, indicating a robust interference effect. Furthermore, the incongruent condition evoked pronounced N450 amplitudes and a more positive slow potential, which might be associated with conflict-monitoring and conflict resolution. The present findings extend our understanding of emotional conflict to the body-word domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.