Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24819101›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the colon and rectum2014

Effect of BMI on outcomes in proctectomy.

Jennifer E Hrabe, Scott K Sherman, Mary E Charlton, John W Cromwell, John C Byrn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the colon and rectum, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prospective Validation of the Iowa Rectal Surgery Risk Calculator.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018
    Article
  14. Obesity as a surgical risk factor.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Development of an improved risk calculator for complications in proctectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer E Hrabe1Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa 2Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa.
Scott K Sherman
Mary E Charlton
John W Cromwell
John C Byrn
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe unique surgical challenges of proctectomy may be amplified in obese patients. We examined surgical outcomes of a large, diverse sample of obese patients undergoing proctectomy.

objectiveThe purpose of this work was to determine whether increased BMI is associated with increased complications in proctectomy.

designThis was a retrospective review. SETTINGS: The study uses the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2010 and 2011). PATIENTS: Patients included were those undergoing nonemergent proctectomy, excluding rectal prolapse cases. Patients were grouped by BMI using the World Health Organization classifications of underweight (BMI <18.5); normal (18.5-24.9); overweight (25.0-29.9); and class I (30.0-34.9), class II (35.0-39.9), and class III (≥40.0) obesity.

main outcome measuresWe analyzed the effect of preoperative and intraoperative factors on 30-day outcomes. Continuous variables were compared with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and proportions with the Fisher exact or χ tests. Logistic regression controlled for the effects of multiple risk factors.

resultsAmong 5570 patients, class I, II, and III obesity were significantly associated with higher rates of overall complications (44.0%, 50.8%, and 46.6% vs 38.1% for normal-weight patients; p < 0.05). Superficial wound infection was significantly higher in classes I, II, and III (11.6%, 17.8%, and 13.0% vs 8.0% for normal-weight patients; p < 0.05). Operative times for patients in all obesity classes were significantly longer than for normal-weight patients. On multivariate analysis, an obese BMI independently predicted complications; ORs (95% CIs) were 1.36 (1.14-1.62) for class I obesity, 1.99 (1.54-2.54) for class II, and 1.42 (1.02-1.96) for class III. LIMITATIONS: This study was a retrospective design with limited follow-up.

conclusionsClass I, II, and III obese patients were at significantly increased risk for morbidity compared with normal BMI patients. Class II obese patients had the highest rate of complications, a finding that deserves further investigation.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexAdultAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedObesityOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsProctoscopyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24819101
PMCPMC4294426
OpenAlexW2324780145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.