Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24818853›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2014

Prostate cancer in young men: an important clinical entity.

Claudia A Salinas, Alex Tsodikov, Miriam Ishak-Howard, Kathleen A Cooney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 161 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
161citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

161 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Navigating work after prostate cancer treatment: a systematic review of qualitative research.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Review
  16. Human papillomavirus (HPV) and p16International urology and nephrology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

101 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Claudia A SalinasDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Alex TsodikovDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Miriam Ishak-HowardDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Kathleen A CooneyDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

Funding

VACCINIA PSA FOR ANDROGEN-MODULATED POST-SURGICAL RECURRENCE OF PROSTATE CANCERP50CA069568 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI COONEY, KATHLEEN A · 1995 to 2013
$31.3M
Modeling prostate cancer control: prevention, screening, treatment, followup careU01CA157224 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI DE KONING, HARRY J, ETZIONI, RUTH D · 2010 to 2014
$5.3M
GENETIC ANALYSIS OF HEREDITARY PROSTATE CANCER FAMILIESR01CA079596 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI COONEY, KATHLEEN A · 1999 to 2009
$3.0M
Genome-wide scan for genetic variants associated with early-onset prostate cancerR01CA136621 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI COONEY, KATHLEEN A · 2009 to 2012
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA069568NCI NIH HHS P50 CA69568NCI NIH HHS R01 CA079596NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136621NCI NIH HHS R01 CA79596NCI NIH HHS U01 CA157224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is considered a disease of older men (aged >65 years), but today over 10% of new diagnoses in the USA occur in young men aged ≤55 years. Early-onset prostate cancer, that is prostate cancer diagnosed at age ≤55 years, differs from prostate cancer diagnosed at an older age in several ways. Firstly, among men with high-grade and advanced-stage prostate cancer, those diagnosed at a young age have a higher cause-specific mortality than men diagnosed at an older age, except those over age 80 years. This finding suggests that important biological differences exist between early-onset prostate cancer and late-onset disease. Secondly, early-onset prostate cancer has a strong genetic component, which indicates that young men with prostate cancer could benefit from evaluation of genetic risk. Furthermore, although the majority of men with early-onset prostate cancer are diagnosed with low-risk disease, the extended life expectancy of these patients exposes them to long-term effects of treatment-related morbidities and to long-term risk of disease progression leading to death from prostate cancer. For these reasons, patients with early-onset prostate cancer pose unique challenges, as well as opportunities, for both research and clinical communities. Current data suggest that early-onset prostate cancer is a distinct phenotype-from both an aetiological and clinical perspective-that deserves further attention.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAge of OnsetBiomarkers, TumorDisease ProgressionEarly Detection of CancerEuropeEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexBiomarkers, TumorProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID24818853
PMCPMC4191828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.