Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24818707›Full record

ArticleInflammation2014

Effects of strains of Lactococcus lactis on the production of nitric oxide and cytokines in murine macrophages.

Chise Suzuki, Ayako Aoki-Yoshida, Hiromi Kimoto-Nira, Miho Kobayashi, Keisuke Sasaki, Koko Mizumachi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Inflammation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chise SuzukiNARO Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, Animal Products Research Division, 2 Ikenodai, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki, 305-0901, Japan, csuzuki@affrc.go.jp.
Ayako Aoki-Yoshida
Hiromi Kimoto-Nira
Miho Kobayashi
Keisuke Sasaki
Koko Mizumachi
Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) is a multifunctional mediator that is involved in a variety of pathologic and physiologic processes. Few studies have addressed the effect of lactic acid bacteria (LAB), especially Lactococcus lactis strains used in dairy products, on inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) induction as a component of the host's gastrointestinal immune response. We investigated the ability of L. lactis strains to induce NO synthesis in the murine macrophage-like cell line J774.1 and in peritoneal macrophages from mice. The degree of NO induction was specific to the L. lactis strain used. Compared with the no-treatment control, heat treatment of L. lactis cells decreased NO and TNF-α levels but further stimulated interleukin (IL)-12 production. Adding L. lactis cells to peritoneal macrophages dose-dependently increased the production of NO and IL-10 but decreased that of IL-12p70. Adding L. lactis cells to interferon-γ-stimulated J774.1 cells enhanced cell death and the production of NO and IL-12p40, whereas addition of 1400W, a specific inhibitor of iNOS, decreased NO production and cell death. Conversely, adding 1400W to J774.1 cells further enhanced IL-12p40 production, suggesting that IL-12 production is perturbed by excess endogenous NO. IL-12 production is thought to be a marker of improved immunostimulation. Our results suggest that IL-12 production could be increased by limiting endogenous NO production.

Indexed as

Lactococcus lactisAnimalsCell DeathCell LineCells, CulturedCytokinesFemaleMacrophages, PeritonealMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNitric OxideCytokinesNitric Oxide

Identifiers

PMID24818707
OpenAlexW1987427012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.