Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24818158›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Outer electrospun polycaprolactone shell induces massive foreign body reaction and impairs axonal regeneration through 3D multichannel chitosan nerve guides.

Sven Duda, Lutz Dreyer, Peter Behrens, Soenke Wienecke, Tanmay Chakradeo, Birgit Glasmacher, Kirsten Haastert-Talini

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Machine intelligence for nerve conduit design and production.Journal of biological engineering · 2020
    Review
  11. Nerve grafting for peripheral nerve injuries with extended defect sizes.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sven DudaHannover Medical School, Institute for Neuroanatomy, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3116-174X
Lutz DreyerInstitute for Multiphase Processes, Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 36, 30167 Hannover, Germany ; 3Institute for Biophysics, Leibniz University Hannover, Herrenhäuser Straße 2, 30419 Hannover, Germany" for the sake of consistency Institute for Biophysics, Leibniz University Hannover, Herrenhäuser Straße 2, 30419 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4380-890X
Peter BehrensInstitute for Multiphase Processes, Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 36, 30167 Hannover, Germany.
Soenke WieneckeInstitute for Multiphase Processes, Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 36, 30167 Hannover, Germany.
Tanmay ChakradeoInstitute for Multiphase Processes, Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 36, 30167 Hannover, Germany.
Birgit GlasmacherInstitute for Multiphase Processes, Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 36, 30167 Hannover, Germany.
Kirsten Haastert-TaliniHannover Medical School, Institute for Neuroanatomy, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany ; Center for Systems Neuroscience (ZSN) Hannover, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2502-8969
Leibniz University Hannover · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report on the performance of composite nerve grafts with an inner 3D multichannel porous chitosan core and an outer electrospun polycaprolactone shell. The inner chitosan core provided multiple guidance channels for regrowing axons. To analyze the in vivo properties of the bare chitosan cores, we separately implanted them into an epineural sheath. The effects of both graft types on structural and functional regeneration across a 10 mm rat sciatic nerve gap were compared to autologous nerve transplantation (ANT). The mechanical biomaterial properties and the immunological impact of the grafts were assessed with histological techniques before and after transplantation in vivo. Furthermore during a 13-week examination period functional tests and electrophysiological recordings were performed and supplemented by nerve morphometry. The sheathing of the chitosan core with a polycaprolactone shell induced massive foreign body reaction and impairment of nerve regeneration. Although the isolated novel chitosan core did allow regeneration of axons in a similar size distribution as the ANT, the ANT was superior in terms of functional regeneration. We conclude that an outer polycaprolactone shell should not be used for the purpose of bioartificial nerve grafting, while 3D multichannel porous chitosan cores could be candidate scaffolds for structured nerve grafts.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsBiocompatible MaterialsChitosanElectrodiagnosisFemaleForeign-Body ReactionGuided Tissue RegenerationInflammationMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMotor ActivityMusclesNerve RegenerationOrgan SizePain PerceptionPolyestersBiocompatible MaterialsChitosanpolycaprolactonePolyesters

Identifiers

PMID24818158
PMCPMC4000981
OpenAlexW2021183807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.