Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24818064›Full record

ArticlePLoS currents2013

A Prospective Study of the Outcome of Patients with Limb Trauma following the Haitian Earthquake in 2010 at One- and Two- Year (The SuTra2 Study).

Marie Christine Delauche, Nikki Blackwell, Hervé Le Perff, Nezha Khallaf, Joël Müller, Stéphane Callens, Thierry Allafort Duverger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS currents, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Gender Differences in Psychosocial and Physical Outcomes in Haitian Amputees.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marie Christine DelaucheThe Alliance for International Medical Action (ALIMA).
Nikki BlackwellThe Alliance for International Medical Action (ALIMA).
Hervé Le PerffThe Alliance for International Medical Action ALIMA, Fann Résidence, BP15530The Alliance for International Medical Action (ALIMA).
Nezha KhallafUniversité Lille Nord de France, LEM UMR 8179 CNRS.
Joël MüllerUniversité Lille Nord de France - Université d'Artois.
Stéphane CallensUniversity of ArtoisLEM UMR 8179 CNRS.
Thierry Allafort DuvergerThe Alliance for International Medical Action (ALIMA).
Alliance for International Medical Action · SNCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité d'Artois · FRUniversité Lille Nord de France · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Severe limb trauma is common in earthquake survivors. Overall medium term outcomes and patient-perceived outcomes are poorly documented. Methods and Findings The prospective study SuTra2 assessed the functional and socio-economic status of a cohort of patients undergoing surgery for limb injury resulting in amputation (A) or limb preservation (LP) one year and two years after the 2010 Haiti earthquake. 305 patients [A: n=199 (65%), LP: n=106 (35%)] were evaluated. Their characteristics were: 57% female; mean age 31 years; 74% of principal injuries involved the lower limb; 46% of patients had an additional severe injury; 60% had fractures, of which two-thirds were compound or associated with severe soft tissue damage; 15% of amputations were traumatic. At 2 years, 51% of patients were satisfied with the functional outcome (A: 52%, LP: 49%, ns). Comparison with the 1-year status indicates a worsening of the perceived functional status, significantly more pronounced in amputees, and an increase in pain complaints, mainly in amputees (62% and 80% of pain in overall population at 1- and 2-year respectively). Twenty eight percent (28%) of LP and 66% of A considered themselves as "cured". 100% of LP and 79% of A would have chosen a conservative approach if an amputation was medically avoidable. Two years after the earthquake, 23·5 % of patients were still living in a tent, 30% were working, and 25·5% needed ongoing surgical management. Conclusions Only half the patients with severe limb injuries, whether managed with amputation or limb preservation, deemed their functional status satisfactory at 2 years. The patients' perspective, clearly favors limb conservative management whenever possible. Prolonged care and rehabilitation are needed to optimize the outcome for earthquake survivors with limb injuries. Humanitarian respondents to catastrophes have professional and ethical obligations to provide optimal immediate care and ensure scrupulous attention to long-term management. Keywords Haiti earthquake, limb injury, two-year outcome, patients' perspective, amputation, limb salvage.

Identifiers

PMID24818064
PMCPMC4011624
OpenAlexW1963659254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.