Observational studyInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2014
Characterization of the pathologic and endoscopic measurements of colorectal polyp sizes with a focus on sessile serrated adenoma and high-grade dysplasia.
Observational study in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Colorectal sessile serrated lesion with large size or synchronous neoplasm: a prospective study.European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020Article
- Herniation of crypts in hyperplastic polyp and sessile serrated adenoma: a prospective study.American journal of cancer research · 2018Article
- Anticancer effect of icaritin inhibits cell growth of colon cancer through reactive oxygen species, Bcl-2 and cyclin D1/E signaling.Oncology letters · 2016Article
- Histology subtypes and polyp size are associated with synchronous colorectal carcinoma of colorectal serrated polyps: a study of 499 serrated polyps.American journal of cancer research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe characteristics of pathologically measured (PMS) and endoscopically measured sizes (EMS) of the colorectal polyps (CRPs) is poorly understood, particularly in polypoid unremarkable mucosa (PUM), sessile serrated adenoma (SSA), and high-grade dysplasia (HGD).
methodsTo characterize the discordance and correlation between the PMS and EMS of CRPs including PUM, SSA, HGD, hyperplastic polyp (HP) and adenomas, we conducted this prospective observational study on the polyps collected between August 2012 and December 2013.
resultsPMS was significantly smaller than EMS in the 497 qualified CRPs regardless of the sites (left, transverse and right colorectum) or EMS (≥1 cm and <1 cm) subgroups. The PMS and EMS discordance was associated with a diagnosis of HP and adenoma (versus PUM, SSA or HGD), single fragment (versus multiple), 3 of the 8 endoscopists and PMS<1 cm (versus ≥1 cm). Despite a good correlation between EMS and PMS in the adenomas (ĸ=0.626, 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.505-0.746) and a moderate correlation in the serrated polyps (SPs) including HP and SSA, (ĸ=0.424, 95% CI, 0.244-0.604), 40.4% (23/57) of the adenomas and 63.6% (21/33) of the SPs with EMS≥1 cm might warrant longer follow-up intervals since their PMS were <1 cm. The PMS and EMS had linear correlations except in CRPs with HGD or EMS≥1 cm.
conclusionsThe discordance between PMS and EMS is associated with the pathologic diagnosis, fragment number, endoscopists and PMS, and may lead to different follow-ups in a considerable portion of adenomas and SPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24817960PMC4014244W88122664What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.