ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2014
Bacteriophages of leuconostoc, oenococcus, and weissella.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of industrial-scale pickling processes on the dynamic changes in the physicochemical indicators and microbial diversities ofFood chemistry: X · 2024Article
- Characterization of Bacteriophage cd2, a Siphophage Infecting Carnobacterium divergens and a Representative Species of a New Genus of Phage.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Microbial community succession and volatile compounds changes during spontaneous fermentation of Cabernet Sauvignon (Food chemistry: X · 2023Article
- Article
- Characterization of Prophages inJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Microbiota Analysis and Microbiological Hazard Assessment in Chinese Chive (Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Bacteriophage-host interactions as a platform to establish the role of phages in modulating the microbial composition of fermented foods.Microbiome research reports · 2022Review
- Exploring the diversity of bacteriophage specific to Oenococcus oeni and Lactobacillus spp and their role in wine production.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Analysis of Transcriptomic Response to SOMicrobiology spectrum · 2021Article
- Viruses in fermented foods: are they good or bad? Two sides of the same coin.Food microbiology · 2021Review
- Isolation and characterisation of novel phages infecting Lactobacillus plantarum and proposal of a new genus, "Silenusvirus".Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Isolation and Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Characterization of the First Virulent Phage InfectingFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Article
- Biodiversity and Classification of Phages InfectingFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Analysis ofFood science and biotechnology · 2018Article
- Complete Genome Sequence of Lytic Oenococcus oeni Bacteriophage OE33PA.Microbiology resource announcements · 2018Article
- Metagenomic Analysis of Dairy Bacteriophages: Extraction Method and Pilot Study on Whey Samples Derived from Using Undefined and Defined Mesophilic Starter Cultures.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2017Article
- Microorganisms in Fermented Apple Beverages: Current Knowledge and Future Directions.Microorganisms · 2017Review
- Lysogeny in nature: mechanisms, impact and ecology of temperate phages.The ISME journal · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leuconostoc (Ln.), Weissella, and Oenococcus form a group of related genera of lactic acid bacteria, which once all shared the name Leuconostoc. They are associated with plants, fermented vegetable products, raw milk, dairy products, meat, and fish. Most of industrially relevant Leuconostoc strains can be classified as either Ln. mesenteroides or Ln. pseudomesenteroides. They are important flavor producers in dairy fermentations and they initiate nearly all vegetable fermentations. Therefore, bacteriophages attacking Leuconostoc strains may negatively influence the production process. Bacteriophages attacking Leuconostoc strains were first reported in 1946. Since then, the majority of described Leuconostoc phages was isolated from either dairy products or fermented vegetable products. Both lytic and temperate phages of Leuconostoc were reported. Most of Leuconostoc phages examined using electron microscopy belong to the Siphoviridae family and differ in morphological details. Hybridization and comparative genomic studies of Leuconostoc phages suggest that they can be divided into several groups, however overall diversity of Leuconostoc phages is much lower as compared to, e.g., lactococcal phages. Several fully sequenced genomes of Leuconostoc phages have been deposited in public databases. Lytic phages of Leuconostoc can be divided into two host species-specific groups with similarly organized genomes that shared very low nucleotide similarity. Phages of dairy Leuconostoc have rather limited host-ranges. The receptor binding proteins of two lytic Ln. pseudomesenteroides phages have been identified. Molecular tools for detection of dairy Leuconostoc phages have been developed. The rather limited data on phages of Oenococcus and Weissella show that (i) lysogeny seems to be abundant in Oenococcus strains, and (ii) several phages infecting Weissella cibaria are also able to productively infect strains of other Weissella species and even strains of the genus Lactobacillus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.