Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24817851›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2014

Safety of liposome extended-release bupivacaine for postoperative pain control.

Juan Portillo, Nawal Kamar, Somayah Melibary, Eduardo Quevedo, Sergio Bergese

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03290196 phase4terminatednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of EXPAREL® on Postsurgical Pain, and the Use of Narcotics

TypeinterventionalSponsorAndrews Research & Education FoundationRan2015 to 2022Enrolled13ConditionsRotator Cuff TearArmsEXPAREL 1.3 % in 20 ML Injection
NCT03769714 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Placebo-controlled, Double-blinded, Randomized Pilot Study of Bupivacaine Liposome Injectable Suspension (EXPAREL) for Minimally Invasive Supracervical Hysterectomies Postsurgical Analgesia

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaimonides Medical CenterRan2018 to 2019Enrolled60ConditionsPainArmsSaline Solution for Injection, Exparel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juan PortilloDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH, USA.
Nawal KamarDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH, USA.
Somayah MelibaryDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH, USA.
Eduardo QuevedoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH, USA.
Sergio BergeseDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH, USA ; Department of Neurological Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH, USA.
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdeal postoperative pain management requires a multidisciplinary approach in combination with a variety of dosage regimens. Approximately 21-30% of patients experience moderate to severe pain in the postoperative period, which may have a significant impact on recovery rate, standard of living, psychological health, and postoperative complications.

objectiveAnalysis of the incidence and characterization of reported adverse effects with DepoFoam bupivacaine compared to conventional bupivacaine or placebo.

methodsA systematic review of prospective studies on the use of DepoFoam versus bupivacaine or placebo was performed in order to answer the clinically relevant question: is DepoFoam a safer formulation in place of bupivacaine single injection or continuous local infusion techniques for postoperative pain management? Inclusion criteria required randomized, controlled, double-blind trials in patients 18 years old or older, single dose used for postoperative pain control, and a primary procedure performed.

resultsSix studies fitted the inclusion criteria for analysis, DepoFoam bupivacaine used in therapeutic doses was well-tolerated, had a higher safety margin, and showed a favorable safety profile compared to bupivacaine and control groups.

conclusionExtended drug delivery system DepoFoam bupivacaine is a promising drug formulation that may significantly improve postoperative care and pain control in surgical patients.

Indexed as

bupivacainebupivacaine HCldepofoamexparelliposome bupivacaine

Identifiers

PMID24817851
PMCPMC4012190
OpenAlexW2061114483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.