Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24817625›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2015

Evaluation of an implementation model: a national investigation of VA residential programs.

Joan M Cook, Stephanie Dinnen, James C Coyne, Richard Thompson, Vanessa Simiola, Josef Ruzek, Paula P Schnurr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joan M CookYale School of Medicine and National Center for PTSD, 950 Campbell Avenue, NEPEC/182, West Haven, CT, 06516, USA, joan.cook@yale.edu.
Stephanie Dinnen
James C Coyne
Richard Thompson
Vanessa Simiola
Josef Ruzek
Paula P Schnurr

Funding

Theory-Driven Mixed-Methods Evaluation of PTSD Treatment Implementation in VA ResRC1MH088454 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI COOK, JOAN M · 2009 to 2010
$918k
NIMH NIH HHS RC1 MH088454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This national investigation utilizes qualitative data to evaluate an implementation model regarding factors influencing provider use of two evidence-based treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Semi-structured qualitative interviews with 198 mental health providers from 38 Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) residential treatment programs were used to explore these issues regarding prolonged exposure (PE) and cognitive processing therapy (CPT) in VA residential PTSD programs. Several unique and some overlapping predictors emerged. Leadership was viewed as an influence on implementation for both CPT and PE, while a lack of dedicated time and resources was viewed as a deterrent for both. Compatibility of CPT with providers' existing practices and beliefs, the ability to observe noticeable patient improvement, a perceived relative advantage of CPT over alternative treatments, and the presence of a supportive peer network emerged as influential on CPT implementation. Leadership was associated with PE implementation. Implications for the design and improvement of training and implementation efforts are discussed.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCognitive Behavioral TherapyEvidence-Based PracticeImplosive TherapyLeadershipHumansQualitative ResearchResidential TreatmentStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticTime FactorsUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID24817625
PMCPMC4240747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.