ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2015
Dengue transmission based on urban environmental gradients in different cities of Pakistan.
Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The role of urbanisation in the spread of Aedes mosquitoes and the diseases they transmit-A systematic review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Pooled it
- Epidemiological trends and risk factors associated with dengue disease in Pakistan (1980-2014): a systematic literature search and analysis.BMC public health · 2018Pooled it
- High-Resolution Geospatial Analysis of Dengue Vulnerability in Urban and Rural Areas of San Luis Potosí, Mexico.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- Year-round dengue fever in Pakistan, highlighting the surge amidst ongoing flood havoc and the COVID-19 pandemic: a comprehensive review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Semi-Supervised Text Classification Framework: An Overview of Dengue Landscape Factors and Satellite Earth Observation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Review
- The spatial and temporal scales of local dengue virus transmission in natural settings: a retrospective analysis.Parasites & vectors · 2018Article
- Observational
- A geo-computational algorithm for exploring the structure of diffusion progression in time and space.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Environmental risk factors and hotspot analysis of dengue distribution in Pakistan.International journal of biometeorology · 2015Article
- Dengue transmission and urban environmental gradients.International journal of biometeorology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study focuses on the dengue transmission in different regions of Pakistan. For this purpose, the data of dengue cases for 2009-2012 from four different cities (Rawalpindi, Islamabad, Lahore, and Karachi) of the country is collected, evaluated, and compiled. To identify the reasons and regions of higher risk of Dengue transmission, land use classification, analysis of climate covariates and drainage patterns was done. Analysis involves processing of SPOT 5 10 m, Landsat TM 30 m data sets, and SRTM 90 m digital elevation models by using remote sensing and GIS techniques. The results are based on the change in urbanization and population density, analysis of temperature, rainfall, and wind speed; calculation of drainage patterns including stream features, flow accumulation, and drainage density of the study areas. Results suggest that the low elevation areas with calm winds and minimum temperatures higher than the normal, rapid increase in unplanned urbanization, low flow accumulation, and higher drainage density areas favor the dengue transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24817491What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.