ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2014
Species identification from hair by means of spectral library searches.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Species identification from hair has been performed in the past by several techniques, such as scanning electron microscopy and polymerase chain reaction. Despite the great promise of mass spectrometry herein, the repetitive glycine stretches and the evolutionary conserved sequences of keratins make the results from conventional database search algorithms on MSMS fragmentation data very ambiguous. Here, we present a new method based on electron spray quadrupole time-of-flight (ESI-Q-TOF) mass spectrometry and spectral library searching. By comparing different sets of data processing parameters, spectral libraries for human, cat, and dog were constructed with the highest possible specificity and sensitivity. This proof of principle was confirmed by the annotation of blind samples. In addition, by providing a step-by-step roadmap for creating such libraries, more species can be included in the future as demonstrated here by the inclusion of sheep and rabbit. Additionally, we illustrate that this approach allows for species identification of a single hair, making this an interesting approach in a forensic setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24817150What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.