Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24817030›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2014

Helmet CPAP vs. oxygen therapy in severe hypoxemic respiratory failure due to pneumonia.

Anna Maria Brambilla, Stefano Aliberti, Elena Prina, Francesco Nicoli, Manuela Del Forno, Stefano Nava, Giovanni Ferrari, Francesco Corradi, Paolo Pelosi, Angelo Bignamini and 2 more

Erratum issued 3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 79 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03515031 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Open Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Oxygen Therapy by High Flow Nasal Cannulae and by Venturi Mask in the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Failure Due to Severe Pneumonia (Hi Flow Oxygen vs Venturi Mask In Pneumonia)

TypeinterventionalSponsorPapa Giovanni XXIII HospitalRan2023 to 2026Enrolled150ConditionsRespiratory Insufficiency, PneumoniaArmsHigh Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation, Venturi Mask Oxygenation
NCT03714321 nacompletednot on this map

Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation Compared With CPAP in Patients Admitted to an Intermediate Care Unit With Pneumonia: a Randomised Controlled Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2014 to 2015Enrolled30ConditionsPneumoniaArmsMechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MIE)
NCT04929691 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The CircumVent Project: A CPAP/O2 Helmet Solution for Non-Invasive Ventilation Using an Implementation Research Framework

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew York UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled370ConditionsSARS-CoV-2 Acute Respiratory Disease, COVID-19 Respiratory InfectionArmsCPAP helmet, Standard of care non-helmet based CPAP ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Chest physiotherapy for pneumonia in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anna Maria BrambillaEmergency Medicine Department, IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Stefano Aliberti
Elena Prina
Francesco Nicoli
Manuela Del Forno
Stefano Nava
Giovanni Ferrari
Francesco Corradi
Paolo Pelosi
Angelo Bignamini
Paolo Tarsia
Roberto Cosentini

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe efficacy of noninvasive continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to improve outcomes in severe hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (hARF) due to pneumonia has not been clearly established. The aim of this study was to compare CPAP vs. oxygen therapy to reduce the risk of meeting criteria for endotracheal intubation (ETI).

methodsIn a multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted in four Italian centers patients with severe hARF due to pneumonia were randomized to receive helmet CPAP (CPAP group) or oxygen delivered with a Venturi mask (control group). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients meeting criteria for ETI, including either one or more major criteria (respiratory arrest, respiratory pauses with unconsciousness, severe hemodynamic instability, intolerance) or at least two minor criteria (reduction of at least 30% of basal PaO2/FiO2 ratio, increase of 20% of PaCO2, worsening of alertness, respiratory distress, SpO2 less than 90%, exhaustion).

resultsBetween February 2010 and 2013, 40 patients were randomized to CPAP and 41 to Venturi mask. The proportion of patients meeting ETI criteria in the CPAP group was significantly lower compared to those in the control group (6/40 = 15% vs. 26/41 = 63%, respectively, p < 0.001; relative risk 0.24, 95% CI 0.11-0.51; number needed to treat, 2) two patients were intubated in the CPAP group and one in the control group. The CPAP group showed a faster and greater improvement in oxygenation in comparison to controls (p < 0.001). In either study group, no relevant adverse events were detected.

conclusionsHelmet CPAP reduces the risk of meeting ETI criteria compared to oxygen therapy in patients with severe hARF due to pneumonia.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressureMasksOxygen Inhalation TherapyAgedFemaleHumansHypoxiaIntubation, IntratrachealMaleMiddle AgedOxygenPneumoniaRespiratory InsufficiencyRespiratory RateSeverity of Illness IndexOxygen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.