Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24817020›Full record

ReviewChromosoma2014

Assembly and nuclear export of pre-ribosomal particles in budding yeast.

Stefan Gerhardy, Anna Maria Menet, Cohue Peña, Janusz Jurand Petkowski, Vikram Govind Panse

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosoma, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Eukaryotic Ribosome assembly and Nucleocytoplasmic Transport.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Puf6 and Loc1 Are the Dedicated Chaperones of Ribosomal Protein Rpl43 inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. ABCE Proteins: From Molecules to Development.Frontiers in plant science · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefan GerhardyInstitute of Biochemistry (IBC), ETH Zürich, Otto-Stern-Weg 3, 8093, Zürich, Switzerland.
Anna Maria Menet
Cohue Peña
Janusz Jurand Petkowski
Vikram Govind Panse

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ribosome is responsible for the final step of decoding genetic information into proteins. Therefore, correct assembly of ribosomes is a fundamental task for all living cells. In eukaryotes, the construction of the ribosome which begins in the nucleolus requires coordinated efforts of >350 specialized factors that associate with pre-ribosomal particles at distinct stages to perform specific assembly steps. On their way through the nucleus, diverse energy-consuming enzymes are thought to release assembly factors from maturing pre-ribosomal particles after accomplishing their task(s). Subsequently, recruitment of export factors prepares pre-ribosomal particles for transport through nuclear pore complexes. Pre-ribosomes are exported into the cytoplasm in a functionally inactive state, where they undergo final maturation before initiating translation. Accumulating evidence indicates a tight coupling between nuclear export, cytoplasmic maturation, and final proofreading of the ribosome. In this review, we summarize our current understanding of nuclear export of pre-ribosomal subunits and cytoplasmic maturation steps that render pre-ribosomal subunits translation-competent.

Indexed as

Active Transport, Cell NucleusCell NucleusModels, MolecularRibosomesRibosome SubunitsSaccharomycetales

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.