Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24816934›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2014

MRI-based determination of reference values of thoracic aortic wall thickness in a general population.

Birger Mensel, Alexander Quadrat, Tobias Schneider, Jens-Peter Kühn, Marcus Dörr, Henry Völzke, Wolfgang Lieb, Katrin Hegenscheid, Roberto Lorbeer

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Aortic Delamination-A Possible Precursor of Impending Catastrophe.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Accuracy of arterial [Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Intima-media thickness of the descending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valve.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Birger MenselInstitute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße, 17475, Greifswald, Germany, birger.mensel@uni-greifswald.de.
Alexander Quadrat
Tobias Schneider
Jens-Peter Kühn
Marcus Dörr
Henry Völzke
Wolfgang Lieb
Katrin Hegenscheid
Roberto Lorbeer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo provide age- and sex-specific reference values for MRI-derived wall thickness of the ascending and descending aorta in the general population. MATERIALS AND

methodsData of 753 subjects (311 females) aged 21-81 years were analysed. MRI was used to determine the aortic wall thickness (AWT). Equations for reference value calculation according to age were established for females and males.

resultsMedian wall thickness of the ascending aorta was 1.46 mm (5th-95th range: 1.15-1.88 mm) for females and 1.56 mm (1.22-1.99 mm) for males. Median wall thickness of the descending aorta was 1.26 mm (0.97-1.58 mm) in females and 1.36 mm (1.04-1.75 mm) in males. While median and 5th and 95th percentiles for the ascending and descending aorta increased with age in both sexes, the association between age and median AWT was stronger in males than in females for both the ascending and descending aorta.

conclusionsReference values for the ascending and descending AWT are provided. In a healthy sample from the general population, the wall of the ascending aorta is thicker than the wall of the descending aorta, and both walls are thicker in males than females. The increase in wall thickness with age is greater in males. KEY POINTS: Ascending aortic wall thickness is greater than descending aortic wall thickness. Ascending and descending aortic wall thickness is greater in males. Thoracic aortic wall thickness increases with age in both sexes. The age-related increase in aortic wall thickness is stronger in males.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAortaAortic DiseasesAtherosclerosisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceReference Values

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.