SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014
Vascular endothelial growth factor gene polymorphism (-634G/C) and breast cancer risk.
Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess if the -634G/C polymorphism represents a predisposition factor for the risk of breast cancer. We included eight published case-control studies, in which a total of 6,175 cancer cases and 6,421 cancer-free controls were included. Pooled ORs and 95 % CIs were calculated by the fixed effects model to evaluate the association of the -634G/C polymorphism and breast cancer risk. When all studies were pooled, we did not find statistical evidence of any significant association with overall breast cancer risk (ORBB vs. bb = 1.00, 95 % CI = 0.93-1.07, P = 0.999; ORBB + Bb vs. bb = 1.00, 95 % CI = 0.95-1.05, P = 0.999; ORBB vs. Bb + bb = 1.03, 95 % CI = 0.96-1.09, P = 0.984; ORallele B vs. allele b = 1.01, 95 % CI = 0.97-1.05, P = 0.998; ORBb vs. bb = 0.99, 95 % CI = 0.92-1.06, P = 0.992). In further stratified analyses by ethnicity and control source, no significant association was revealed. This study suggests that the -634G/C polymorphism does not appear to represent a risk factor for breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.