Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24816909›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2014

Microcirculatory significance of periprocedural myocardial necrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention assessed by the index of microcirculatory resistance.

Zhiming Wu, Fei Ye, Wei You, Junjie Zhang, Dujiang Xie, Shaoliang Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cardiovascular imaging 2014 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhiming WuDepartment of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, No. 68, Changle Street, Nanjing City, People's Republic of China, wuzhiming1997@126.com.
Fei Ye
Wei You
Junjie Zhang
Dujiang Xie
Shaoliang Chen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study sought to investigate the relationship between the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and periprocedural myocardial necrosis in patients with unstable angina pectoris (UAP). Fifty-seven UAP patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of a single lesion were recruited. A pressure-temperature sensor wire was used to measure IMR immediately after PCI. Total creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) and troponin I (TNI) were measured every 8 h after PCI until they began to decline. Of the 57 patients studied, 22 had periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) according to TNI. Post-PCI IMR >31 U had 86% sensitivity and 91% specificity for predicting periprocedural MI. There are a strong positive correlation between IMR and peak TNI (r = 0.805, p = 0.001), and a moderate positive correlation between IMR and peak CK-MB (r = 0.608, p = 0.003). Periprocedural myocardial injury, even in small area, during reperfusion is associated with impaired microcirculatory integrity as evaluated by IMR. Post-PCI IMR is independent predictive of developing periprocedural MI in patients with UAP, and, therefore, potentially enables a triage of higher risk patients to more intensive therapy.

Indexed as

Coronary CirculationMicrocirculationVascular ResistanceAgedAngina, UnstableBiomarkersChinaCreatine Kinase, MB FormCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumNecrosisBiomarkersCreatine Kinase, MB FormTroponin I

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.