Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24816783›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2014

Onco-epidemiology of domestic animals and targeted therapeutic attempts: perspectives on human oncology.

Alessandro Di Cerbo, Beniamino Palmieri, Gionata De Vico, Tommaso Iannitti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Disease Animal Models for Cancer Research.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alessandro Di CerboPoliambulatorio del Secondo Parere, Modena, Italy.
Beniamino Palmieri
Gionata De Vico
Tommaso Iannitti

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spontaneous tumor biology has been investigated with the support of animalists using animals as a preclinical model allowing translation of results in clinical practice. This review provides an insight into the field of comparative oncology. Evidence shows that companion animal health care is impressively growing in terms of development of new therapies and diagnostic tools, nutrition and disease prevention. However, even if most animal tumors might be a reliable model to study human carcinomas, many open questions, related to the opportunities to select and recruit new models in oncology, along with their legal and ethical implications, remain unanswered.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCat DiseasesCatsDog DiseasesDogsHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsPetsTranslational Research, BiomedicalAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID24816783
PMCPMC4196033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.