ArticlePloS one2014
Comparing screening instruments to predict posttraumatic stress disorder.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prevalence of war-related posttraumatic stress disorder in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence of posttraumatic stress symptoms among physicians - A meta-analysis.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025Pooled it
- The relationship between language features and PTSD symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Transgenerational transfer of genocidal trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Physician Posttraumatic Stress Disorder During COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- ICU-specific virtual reality for mental health after critical illness: an international three-arm randomized clinical trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Late fetal demise, a risk factor for post-traumatic stress disorder.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Intranasal Oxytocin Affects Amygdala Functional Connectivity after Trauma Script-Driven Imagery in Distressed Recently Trauma-Exposed Individuals.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2016Trial
- Effects of intranasal oxytocin on amygdala reactivity to emotional faces in recently trauma-exposed individuals.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2016Trial
- Conflict, mental health, and labor productivity: evidence from hired farm workers in Myanmar.BMC global and public health · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of a short prognostic screening instrument for PTSD one year following individual civilian trauma.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Article
- Assessing trauma-related symptomatology in the Netherlands: the Dutch Global Psychotrauma Screen (GPS).European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Article
- PTSD course and predictors in a 15 year longitudinal cohort following suspected serious injury.Npj mental health research · 2025Article
- Trauma Burden Affected People with Multiple Sclerosis During SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Towards accurate screening and prevention for PTSD (2-ASAP): protocol of a longitudinal prospective cohort study.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- A diagnostic questionnaire for childbirth related posttraumatic stress disorder: a validation study.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2024Article
- The associates of anxiety among lung cancer patients: Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) as a potential biomarker.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Long-term PTSD prevalence and associated adverse psychological, functional, and economic outcomes: a 12-15 year follow-up of adults with suspected serious injury.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2024Article
- Trajectories of distress and recovery, secondary stressors and social cure processes in people who used the resilience hub after the Manchester Arena bombing.BJPsych open · 2023Article
- Negative representations of night-shift work and mental health of public hospital healthcare workers in the COVID-19 era (Aladdin survey).BMC health services research · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFollowing traumatic exposure, a proportion of trauma victims develops posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Early PTSD risk screening requires sensitive instruments to identify everyone at risk for developing PTSD in need of diagnostic follow-up.
aimsThis study compares the accuracy of the 4-item SPAN, 10-item Trauma Screening Questionnaire (TSQ) and 22-item Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) in predicting chronic PTSD at a minimum sensitivity of 80%.
methodInjury patients admitted to a level-I trauma centre (N = 311) completed the instruments at a median of 23 days and were clinically assessed for PTSD at 6 months. Areas under the curve and specificities at 80% sensitivity were compared between instruments.
resultsAreas under the curve in all instruments were adequate (SPAN: 0.83; TSQ: 0.82; IES-R: 0.83) with no significant differences. At 80% sensitivity, specificities were 64% for SPAN, 59% for TSQ and 72% for IES-R.
conclusionThe SPAN, TSQ and IES-R show similar accuracy in early detection of individuals at risk for PTSD, despite differences in number of items. The modest specificities and low positive predictive values found for all instruments could lead to relatively many false positive cases, when applied in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.