Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24816372›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2014

The Gini coefficient: a methodological pilot study to assess fetal brain development employing postmortem diffusion MRI.

Adrian Viehweger, Till Riffert, Bibek Dhital, Thomas R Knösche, Alfred Anwander, Holger Stepan, Ina Sorge, Wolfgang Hirsch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adrian ViehwegerDepartment of Pediatric Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany, adrian.viehweger@googlemail.com.
Till Riffert
Bibek Dhital
Thomas R Knösche
Alfred Anwander
Holger Stepan
Ina Sorge
Wolfgang Hirsch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is important in the assessment of fetal brain development. However, it is clinically challenging and time-consuming to prepare neuromorphological examinations to assess real brain age and to detect abnormalities.

objectiveTo demonstrate that the Gini coefficient can be a simple, intuitive parameter for modelling fetal brain development. MATERIALS AND

methodsPostmortem fetal specimens(n = 28) were evaluated by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) on a 3-T MRI scanner using 60 directions, 0.7-mm isotropic voxels and b-values of 0, 150, 1,600 s/mm(2). Constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD) was used as the local diffusion model. Fractional anisotropy (FA), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and complexity (CX) maps were generated. CX was defined as a novel diffusion metric. On the basis of those three parameters, the Gini coefficient was calculated.

resultsStudy of fetal brain development in postmortem specimens was feasible using DWI. The Gini coefficient could be calculated for the combination of the three diffusion parameters. This multidimensional Gini coefficient correlated well with age (Adjusted R(2) = 0.59) between the ages of 17 and 26 gestational weeks.

conclusionsWe propose a new method that uses an economics concept, the Gini coefficient, to describe the whole brain with one simple and intuitive measure, which can be used to assess the brain's developmental state.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAutopsyBrainDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFeasibility StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMalePrenatal DiagnosisReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.