Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24816336›Full record

ArticleJournal of social work in disability & rehabilitation2014

Number of people in the United States experiencing ambulatory and independent living difficulties.

Carlos Siordia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mobility of Older Adults: Gait Quality Measures Are Associated With Life-Space Assessment Scores.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Disability Prevalence.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Disability Prevalence According to a Class, Race, and Sex (CSR) Hypothesis.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Carlos Siordiaa Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health , University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA.

Funding

TRAINING IN THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF AGINGT32AG000181 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STROTMEYER, ELSA S. · 1989 to 2025
$6.2M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000181NIA NIH HHS T32AG000181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimating the characteristics of the "disabled" population is necessary for some governments and of interest to health researchers concerned with producing disability prevalence rates. Because generating easy-to-understand estimates of disability in the population is important, this article provides U.S. population estimates for two disability-related measures by using the 2009 to 2011 American Community Survey Public Use Microdata Sample file. The number of people who have "independent living" and "ambulatory" difficulties is calculated from a sample of 9,204,437 (representing >309 million people). The percentage for "disabled" is found to vary by racial and ethnic category, sex, age, citizenship status, educational attainment, and state-level regions divided by weather.

Indexed as

Independent LivingMobility LimitationAgedAge DistributionFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesRacial GroupsSex DistributionUnited Statesambulatory difficultiesdisabilityelderlyethnic minoritiesgender equitygeographic information systems (GIS)independent livingpeople with disabilities

Identifiers

PMID24816336
PMCPMC4127098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.