Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24816262›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2014

Cell-generated traction forces and the resulting matrix deformation modulate microvascular alignment and growth during angiogenesis.

Clayton J Underwood, Lowell T Edgar, James B Hoying, Jeffrey A Weiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biological aspects in controlling angiogenesis: current progress.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022
    Review
  9. Matrix anisotropy promotes angiogenesis in a density-dependent manner.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Clayton J UnderwoodDepartment of Bioengineering, and Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; and.
Lowell T EdgarDepartment of Bioengineering, and Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; and.
James B HoyingDivision of Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Cardiovascular Innovation Institute, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
Jeffrey A WeissDepartment of Bioengineering, and Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; and jeff.weiss@utah.edu.

Funding

Angiogenesis and the Extracellular MatrixR01HL077683 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI WEISS, JEFFREY A. · 2004 to 2011
$3.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL-077683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The details of the mechanical factors that modulate angiogenesis remain poorly understood. Previous in vitro studies of angiogenesis using microvessel fragments cultured within collagen constructs demonstrated that neovessel alignment can be induced via mechanical constraint of the boundaries (i.e., boundary conditions). The objective of this study was to investigate the role of mechanical boundary conditions in the regulation of angiogenic alignment and growth in an in vitro model of angiogenesis. Angiogenic microvessels within three-dimensional constructs were subjected to different boundary conditions, thus producing different stress and strain fields during growth. Neovessel outgrowth and orientation were quantified from confocal image data after 6 days. Vascularity and branching decreased as the amount of constraint imposed on the culture increased. In long-axis constrained hexahedral constructs, microvessels aligned parallel to the constrained axis. In contrast, constructs that were constrained along the short axis had random microvessel orientation. Finite element models were used to simulate the contraction of gels under the various boundary conditions and to predict the local strain field experienced by microvessels. Results from the experiments and simulations demonstrated that microvessels aligned perpendicular to directions of compressive strain. Alignment was due to anisotropic deformation of the matrix from cell-generated traction forces interacting with the mechanical boundary conditions. These findings demonstrate that boundary conditions and thus the effective stiffness of the matrix regulate angiogenesis. This study offers a potential explanation for the oriented vascular beds that occur in native tissues and provides the basis for improved control of tissue vascularization in both native tissues and tissue-engineered constructs.

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularNeovascularization, PhysiologicAdipose TissueAnimalsCollagen Type IEpididymisFinite Element AnalysisMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalMicrovesselsModels, CardiovascularRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyStress, MechanicalTime FactorsTissue Culture TechniquesCollagen Type Iangiogenesisdeformationimage analysismorphometryorientationstrain

Identifiers

PMID24816262
PMCPMC4101638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.