Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24816240›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2014

Molecular response assessment by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction after induction therapy in NPM1-mutated patients identifies those at high risk of relapse.

Max Hubmann, Thomas Köhnke, Eva Hoster, Stephanie Schneider, Annika Dufour, Evelyn Zellmeier, Michael Fiegl, Jan Braess, Stefan K Bohlander, Marion Subklewe and 6 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00266136 phase3completednot on this map

Risk-stratified Therapy for Primary and Secondary AML and MDS. A Randomized Study by AMLCG in Relation to Cytogenetically Defined Prognostic Factors (1) on the Role of High-dose AraC as Part of Double Induction, (2) on G-CSF Priming, and (3) on High-dose Chemotherapy With Stem Cell Transplantation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital MuensterRan1999 to 2012Enrolled3,500ConditionsAcute Myeloid LeukemiaArmsCytarabine, Thioguanine, Daunorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, G-CSF
NCT01382147 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Risk and Age Adapted Comparison of the Dose-Dense Regimen S-HAM (Sequential High Dose Cytosine Arabinoside and Mitoxantrone) Versus Standard Double Induction for Initial Chemotherapy of Adult Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

TypeinterventionalSponsorProf. Dr. Wolfgang HiddemannRan2009 to 2017Enrolled396ConditionsAcute Myeloid LeukemiaArmsAra-C, Mitoxantrone, Daunorubicin, Thioguanin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Acute Myeloid Leukemia-Use of Measurable Residual Disease to Improve Outcomes.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Max HubmannDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich, Germany max.hubmann@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Thomas KöhnkeDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
Eva HosterInstitute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany.
Stephanie SchneiderDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
Annika DufourDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
Evelyn ZellmeierDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
Michael FieglDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
Jan BraessDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Barmherzige Brüder Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.
Stefan K BohlanderDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Marion SubkleweDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich, Germany Clinical Cooperation Group Immunotherapy, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany.
Maria-Cristina SauerlandInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, Germany.
Wolfgang E BerdelDepartment of Medicine A, Hematology and Oncology, University of Muenster, Germany.
Thomas BüchnerDepartment of Medicine A, Hematology and Oncology, University of Muenster, Germany.
Bernhard WörmannGerman Society of Hematology and Oncology, Berlin, Germany.
Wolfgang HiddemannDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
Karsten SpiekermannDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich, Germany Clinical Cooperation Group Leukemia, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany.
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DEUniversity of Münster · DEGerman Society of Surgery · DEKrankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder · DEUniversity of Auckland · NZZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring minimal residual disease is an important way to identify patients with acute myeloid leukemia at high risk of relapse. In this study we investigated the prognostic potential of minimal residual disease monitoring by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of NPM1 mutations in patients treated in the AMLCG 1999, 2004 and 2008 trials. Minimal residual disease was monitored - in aplasia, after induction therapy, after consolidation therapy, and during follow-up - in 588 samples from 158 patients positive for NPM1 mutations A, B and D (with a sensitivity of 10(-6)). One hundred and twenty-seven patients (80.4%) achieved complete remission after induction therapy and, of these, 56 patients (44.1%) relapsed. At each checkpoint, minimal residual disease cut-offs were calculated. After induction therapy a cut-off NPM1 mutation ratio of 0.01 was associated with a high hazard ratio of 4.26 and the highest sensitivity of 76% for the prediction of relapse. This was reflected in a cumulative incidence of relapse after 2 years of 77.8% for patients with ratios above the cut-off versus 26.4% for those with ratios below the cut-off. In the favorable subgroup according to European LeukemiaNet, the cut-off after induction therapy also separated the cohort into two prognostic groups with a cumulative incidence of relapse of 76% versus 6% after 2 years. Our data demonstrate that in addition to pre-therapeutic factors, the course of minimal residual disease in an individual is an important prognostic factor and could be included in clinical trials for the guidance of post-remission therapy. The trials from which data were obtained were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT01382147, #NCT00266136) and at the European Leukemia Trial Registry (#LN_AMLINT2004_230).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInduction ChemotherapyLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedMutationNuclear ProteinsNucleophosminProspective StudiesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionNPM1 protein, humanNuclear ProteinsNucleophosmin

Identifiers

PMID24816240
PMCPMC4116830
OpenAlexW2015695061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.