Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24816199›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Urban and rural safety net health care system clinics: no disparity in HPV4 vaccine completion rates.

Kelly Jo Sandri, Inge Verdenius, Mitchell J Bartley, Britney M Else, Christopher A Paynter, Beth E Rosemergey, George D Harris, Gerard J Malnar, Sean M Harper, R Stephen Griffith and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kelly Jo SandriDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
Inge VerdeniusRadboud University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Mitchell J BartleyDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
Britney M ElseDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
Christopher A PaynterDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
Beth E RosemergeyDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
George D HarrisDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
Gerard J MalnarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
Sean M HarperHampshire College, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.
R Stephen GriffithDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
Aaron J BonhamDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
Diane M HarperDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America; Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
University of Missouri–Kansas City · USHampshire College · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSafety net health care centers in the US serve vulnerable and underinsured females. The primary aim of this work was to determine if HPV4 dosing compliance differs between females who receive doses at rural vs. urban core safety net health care locations.

methodsFemales exclusively receiving health care in the Truman Medical Center (TMC) safety net system at the urban core and rural locations were identified by their HPV4 vaccine records. Dates and number of HPV4 doses as well as age, gravidity, parity and race/ethnicity were recorded from the electronic medical record (EMR). Appropriate HPV4 dosing intervals were referenced from the literature.

results1259 females, 10-26 years of age, received HPV4 vaccination at either the rural (23%) or urban core location (77%). At the rural location, 23% received three doses on time, equal to the 24% at the urban core. Females seen in the urban core were more likely to receive on-time doublet dosing than on-time triplet dosing (82% vs. 67%, p<0.001). Mistimed doses occurred equally often among females receiving only two doses, as well as those receiving three doses.

conclusionsCompliance with on-time HPV4 triplet dose completion was low at rural and urban core safety net health clinics, but did not differ by location.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildDelivery of Health CareDose-Response Relationship, ImmunologicFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMissouriPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPatient ComplianceRetrospective StudiesRural PopulationUrban PopulationVaccinationPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID24816199
PMCPMC4015932
OpenAlexW1976315821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.