Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24815823›Full record

ArticleDental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials2014

Can 1% chlorhexidine diacetate and ethanol stabilize resin-dentin bonds?

Adriana Pigozzo Manso, Rosa Helena Miranda Grande, Ana Karina Bedran-Russo, Alessandra Reis, Alessandro D Loguercio, David Henry Pashley, Ricardo Marins Carvalho

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Adriana Pigozzo MansoUniversity of British Columbia, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral Biological and Medical Sciences, Division of Biomaterials, Vancouver, BC, Canada; University of São Paulo, School of Dentistry, Department of Dental Biomaterials and Biochemistry, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Rosa Helena Miranda GrandeUniversity of São Paulo, School of Dentistry, Department of Dental Biomaterials and Biochemistry, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ana Karina Bedran-RussoUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, College of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alessandra ReisUniversity of Ponta Grossa, School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil.
Alessandro D LoguercioUniversity of Ponta Grossa, School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil.
David Henry PashleyGeorgia Regents University, College of Dental Medicine, Department of Oral Biology and Maxillofacial Pathology, Augusta, GA, USA.
Ricardo Marins CarvalhoUniversity of British Columbia, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral Biological and Medical Sciences, Division of Biomaterials, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Electronic address: rickmc@dentistry.ubc.ca.
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa · BRUniversity of British Columbia · CAAugusta University · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Reasons for poor durability of resin-dentin bondsR01DE015306 · NIDCR · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA (MCG) · PI PASHLEY, DAVID H · 2004 to 2013
$4.4M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE015306NIDCR NIH HHS R01-DE-015306-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the effects of the combined use of chlorhexidine and ethanol on the durability of resin-dentin bonds.

methodsForty-eight flat dentin surfaces were etched (32% phosphoric acid), rinsed (15 s) and kept wet until bonding procedures. Dentin surfaces were blot-dried with absorbent paper and re-wetted with water (water, control), 1% chlorhexidine diacetate in water (CHD/water), 100% ethanol (ethanol), or 1% chlorhexidine diacetate in ethanol (CHD/ethanol) solutions for 30 s. They were then bonded with All Bond 3 (AB3, Bisco) or Excite (EX, Ivoclar-Vivadent) using a smooth, continuous rubbing application (10 s), followed by 15 s gentle air stream to evaporate solvents. The adhesives were light-cured (20 s) and resin composite build-ups constructed for the microtensile method. Bonded beams were obtained and tested after 24-h, 6-months and 15-months of water storage at 37°C. Storage water was changed every month. Effects of treatment and testing periods were analyzed (ANOVA, Holm-Sidak, p<0.05) for each adhesive.

resultsThere were no interactions between factors for both etch-and-rinse adhesives. AB3 was significantly affected only by storage (p=0.003). Excite was significantly affected only by treatments (p=0.048). AB3 treated either with ethanol or CHD/ethanol resulted in reduced bond strengths after 15 months. The use of CHD/ethanol resulted in higher bond strengths values for Excite.

conclusionsCombined use of ethanol/1% chlorhexidine diacetate did not stabilize bond strengths after 15 months.

Indexed as

Dental BondingChlorhexidineDentinEthanolHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMaterials TestingResin CementsTensile StrengthChlorhexidineEthanolResin CementsBondingChlorhexidineDentinEthanol-wet bondingStability

Identifiers

PMID24815823
PMCPMC4151321
OpenAlexW2021046897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.