ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2014
Temporal control and compensation for perturbed voicing feedback.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Auditory feedback control in adults who stutter during metronome-paced speech I. Timing Perturbation.Journal of fluency disorders · 2023Article
- Speakers monitor auditory feedback for temporal alignment and linguistically relevant duration.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Perturbing the consistency of auditory feedback in speech.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Temporal malleability to auditory feedback perturbation is modulated by rhythmic abilities and auditory acuity.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Auditory Feedback Is Used for Adaptation and Compensation in Speech Timing.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021Article
- Differential contributions of the two cerebral hemispheres to temporal and spectral speech feedback control.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Precision of voicing perceptual identification is altered in association with voice-onset time production changes.Experimental brain research · 2019Article
- Supra-Segmental Changes in Speech Production as a Result of Spectral Feedback Degradation: Comparison with Lombard Speech.Language and speech · 2018Article
- Modulation of auditory-motor learning in response to formant perturbation as a function of delayed auditory feedback.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Previous research employing a real-time auditory perturbation paradigm has shown that talkers monitor their own speech attributes such as fundamental frequency, vowel intensity, vowel formants, and fricative noise as part of speech motor control. In the case of vowel formants or fricative noise, what was manipulated is spectral information about the filter function of the vocal tract. However, segments can be contrasted by parameters other than spectral configuration. It is possible that the feedback system monitors phonation timing in the way it does spectral information. This study examined whether talkers exhibit a compensatory behavior when manipulating information about voicing. When talkers received feedback of the cognate of the intended voicing category (saying "tipper" while hearing "dipper" or vice versa), they changed the voice onset time and in some cases the following vowel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.