Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24814780›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2014

Microbial population dynamics in the hemolymph of Manduca sexta infected with Xenorhabdus nematophila and the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae.

Swati Singh, Jordan M Reese, Angel M Casanova-Torres, Heidi Goodrich-Blair, Steven Forst

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pleiotropic role of PAX cyclolipopeptides in theApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. ExploringMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparative Nanopore Sequencing-Based Evaluation of the Midgut Microbiota of the Summer Chafer (International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Screening and Molecular Identification of Bacteria from the Midgut ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Swati SinghDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Jordan M ReeseDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Angel M Casanova-TorresDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Heidi Goodrich-BlairDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Steven ForstDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA sforst@uwm.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

GRADUATE TRAINING IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCEST32GM007215 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HULL, CHRISTINA M · 1985 to 2018
$22.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xenorhabdus nematophila engages in a mutualistic association with the nematode Steinernema carpocapsae. The nematode invades and traverses the gut of susceptible insects. X. nematophila is released in the insect blood (hemolymph), where it suppresses host immune responses and functions as a pathogen. X. nematophila produces diverse antimicrobials in laboratory cultures. The natural competitors that X. nematophila encounters in the hemolymph and the role of antimicrobials in interspecies competition in the host are poorly understood. We show that gut microbes translocate into the hemolymph when the nematode penetrates the insect intestine. During natural infection, Staphylococcus saprophyticus was initially present and subsequently disappeared from the hemolymph, while Enterococcus faecalis proliferated. S. saprophyticus was sensitive to X. nematophila antibiotics and was eliminated from the hemolymph when coinjected with X. nematophila. In contrast, E. faecalis was relatively resistant to X. nematophila antibiotics. When injected by itself, E. faecalis persisted (~10(3) CFU/ml), but when coinjected with X. nematophila, it proliferated to ~10(9) CFU/ml. Injection of E. faecalis into the insect caused the upregulation of an insect antimicrobial peptide, while the transcript levels were suppressed when E. faecalis was coinjected with X. nematophila. Its relative antibiotic resistance together with suppression of the host immune system by X. nematophila may account for the growth of E. faecalis. At higher injected levels (10(6) CFU/insect), E. faecalis could kill insects, suggesting that it may contribute to virulence in an X. nematophila infection. These findings provide new insights into the competitive events that occur early in infection after S. carpocapsae invades the host hemocoel.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsEnterococcus faecalisHemolymphIntestinesLarvaManducaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNematodaPopulation DynamicsSymbiosisXenorhabdusAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID24814780
PMCPMC4068695
OpenAlexW2125441027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.