Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24814287›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2014

Distinguishing between "function" and "effect" in genome biology.

W Ford Doolittle, Tyler D P Brunet, Stefan Linquist, T Ryan Gregory

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. De Novo Emerged Gene Search in Eukaryotes with DENSE.Genome biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Non-Darwinian Molecular Biology.Frontiers in genetics · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

W Ford DoolittleDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada ford@dal.ca.
Tyler D P BrunetDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Stefan LinquistDepartment of Philosophy, University of Guelph, ON, Canada.
T Ryan GregoryDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, ON, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much confusion in genome biology results from conflation of possible meanings of the word "function." We suggest that, in this connection, attention should be paid to evolutionary biologists and philosophers who have previously dealt with this problem. We need only decide that although all genomic structures have effects, only some of them should be said to have functions. Although it will very often be difficult or impossible to establish function (strictly defined), it should not automatically be assumed. We enjoin genomicists in particular to pay greater attention to parsing biological effects.

Indexed as

GenomicsMolecular BiologyQuantitative Trait, HeritableSelection, GeneticTerminology as TopicGenomeGenome, HumanHumansMicrofilament ProteinsMicrofilament ProteinsTRIOBP protein, humancausal roleENCODE projectfunctional genomicsselected effect

Identifiers

PMID24814287
PMCPMC4041003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.