Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24814066›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2014

The hybrid nature of the Eukaryota and a consilient view of life on Earth.

James O McInerney, Mary J O'Connell, Davide Pisani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Toward a genomic understanding of the tree of life.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Microbes 'R' us.Environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Eukaryogenesis and oxygen in Earth history.Nature ecology & evolution · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tempos and modes of collectivity in the history of life.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James O McInerneyBioinformatics and Molecular Evolution Unit, Department of Biology, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland.
Mary J O'ConnellBioinformatics and Molecular Evolution Group, School of Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Davide PisaniSchool of Biological Sciences and School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK.
Dublin City University · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The origin of the eukaryotic cell, which is known as eukaryogenesis, has puzzled scientists for more than 100 years, and many hypotheses have been proposed. Recent analyses of new data enable the safe elimination of some of these hypotheses, whereas support for other hypotheses has increased. In this Opinion article, we evaluate the available theories for their compatibility with empirical observations and conclude that cellular life consists of two primary, paraphyletic prokaryotic groups and one secondary, monophyletic group that has symbiogenic origins - the eukaryotes.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEukaryotaProkaryotic Cells

Identifiers

PMID24814066
OpenAlexW2144175810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.