Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24813806›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2014

Conditioned taste aversion, drugs of abuse and palatability.

Jian-You Lin, Joe Arthurs, Steve Reilly

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluating proxies for motion sickness in rodent.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jian-You LinUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, United States. Electronic address: jlin2@uic.edu.
Joe ArthursUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, United States.
Steve ReillyUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, United States. Electronic address: sreilly@uic.edu.
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Parabrachial-Forebrain Interactions in CTAR01DC006456 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI REILLY, STEPHEN · 2004 to 2020
$3.9M
Parabrachial-Forebrain Interactions in Conditioned Taste AversionR56DC006456 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI REILLY, STEPHEN · 2009 to 2009
$339k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC006456NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006456NIDCD NIH HHS R56 DC006456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We consider conditioned taste aversion to involve a learned reduction in the palatability of a taste (and hence in amount consumed) based on the association that develops when a taste experience is followed by gastrointestinal malaise. The present article evaluates the well-established finding that drugs of abuse, at doses that are otherwise considered rewarding and self-administered, cause intake suppression. Our recent work using lick pattern analysis shows that drugs of abuse also cause a palatability downshift and, therefore, support conditioned taste aversion learning.

Indexed as

AnimalsAvoidance LearningConditioning, PsychologicalFood PreferencesHumansIllicit DrugsSubstance-Related DisordersTaste PerceptionIllicit DrugsConditioned taste aversionDanger signalDrugs of abuseLick pattern analysisPalatabilityTaste avoidance learningTaste neophobiaTaste reactivity

Identifiers

PMID24813806
PMCPMC4134772
OpenAlexW2083279216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.