ArticlePatient education and counseling2014
Application of best practice approaches for designing decision support tools: the preparatory education about clinical trials (PRE-ACT) study.
Article in Patient education and counseling, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Current trends in patient and public involvement in cancer research: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Pooled it
- An Evaluation of Clinical Trial Multimedia to Support Hispanic Cancer Patients' Informational and Decision-Making Needs.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Trial
- Financial Burden of Cancer Clinical Trial Participation and the Impact of a Cancer Care Equity Program.The oncologist · 2016Trial
- Randomized Trial of a Web-Based Intervention to Address Barriers to Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016Trial
- Right Information, Right Patient, Right Time: Utilizing the MyCareCompass Platform to Deliver Patient Education in the Oncology Setting.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023Article
- Challenges in the care of patients with RET-altered thyroid cancer: a multicountry mixed-methods study.Thyroid research · 2023Article
- Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- User-centered and theory-based design of a professional training program on shared decision-making with older adults living with neurocognitive disorders: a mixed-methods study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Development of a Plain Language Decision Support Tool for Cancer Clinical Trials: Blending Health Literacy, Academic Research, and Minority Patient Perspectives.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020Article
- A Review of Best Practices for Monitoring and Improving Inpatient Pediatric Patient Experiences.Hospital pediatrics · 2020Review
- Review
- Participatory Methods to Engage Health Service Users in the Development of Electronic Health Resources: Systematic Review.Journal of participatory medicine · 2019Review
- A stakeholder-driven approach to improve the informed consent process for palliative chemotherapy.Patient education and counseling · 2017Article
- A Data Capture Framework for Large-scale Interventional Studies with Survey Workflow Management.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2017Article
- Financial Concerns About Participation in Clinical Trials Among Patients With Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016Article
- Development and utilization of complementary communication channels for treatment decision making and survivorship issues among cancer patients: The CIS Research Consortium Experience.Internet interventions · 2015Article
- A Bridging Opportunities Work-frame to develop mobile applications for clinical decision making.Future science OA · 2015Article
- Development and preliminary testing of PROGRESS: a Web-based education program for prostate cancer survivors transitioning from active treatment.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2015Article
- Development of an Internet Intervention to Address Behaviors Associated with Skin Cancer Risk among Young Adults.Internet interventions · 2015Article
- Is 'informed consent' an 'understood consent' in hematopoietic cell transplantation?Bone marrow transplantation · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis article describes the rigorous development process and initial feedback of the PRE-ACT (Preparatory Education About Clinical Trials) web-based- intervention designed to improve preparation for decision making in cancer clinical trials.
methodsThe multi-step process included stakeholder input, formative research, user testing and feedback. Diverse teams (researchers, advocates and developers) participated including content refinement, identification of actors, and development of video scripts. Patient feedback was provided in the final production period and through a vanguard group (N=100) from the randomized trial.
resultsPatients/advocates confirmed barriers to cancer clinical trial participation, including lack of awareness and knowledge, fear of side effects, logistical concerns, and mistrust. Patients indicated they liked the tool's user-friendly nature, the organized and comprehensive presentation of the subject matter, and the clarity of the videos.
conclusionThe development process serves as an example of operationalizing best practice approaches and highlights the value of a multi-disciplinary team to develop a theory-based, sophisticated tool that patients found useful in their decision making process. Practice implications Best practice approaches can be addressed and are important to ensure evidence-based tools that are of value to patients and supports the usefulness of a process map in the development of e-health tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.