Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24813238›Full record

ArticleActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2014

Development and psychometric properties of the Swedish ALPS-Neo pain and stress assessment scale for newborn infants.

Pia Lundqvist, Agneta Kleberg, Anna-Karin Edberg, Björn A Larsson, Lena Hellström-Westas, Elisabeth Norman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06344741 (Comparison of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Early and Late Admission to the Delivery Room), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06344741 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Early and Late Admission to the Delivery Room

TypeobservationalSponsorKocaeli UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled248ConditionsFear of Childbirth, Neonatal, Pain, Maternal Distress (During Labor)ArmsAccepted in latent phase, Accepted in active phase
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical rating scales for assessing pain in newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Opioids for newborn infants receiving mechanical ventilation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Clonidine for pain in non-ventilated infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pia LundqvistDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Agneta Kleberg
Anna-Karin Edberg
Björn A Larsson
Lena Hellström-Westas
Elisabeth Norman
Karolinska University Hospital · SELund University · SEKristianstad University · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo validate and evaluate the psychometric properties of the ALPS-Neo, a new pain assessment scale created for the continuous evaluation of pain and stress in preterm and sick term infants.

methodsA unidimensional scale for continuous pain, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital Pain Scale (ALPS 1), was developed further to assess continuous pain and stress in infants treated in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The pain scale includes observations of five behaviours. A manual was created, clarifying the scoring criteria. An internal and an external panel assessed face validity. Psychometric properties were evaluated in three different steps. Inter-rater reliability was estimated from video-based assessments (n = 625) using weighted kappa statistics (test I). Inter-rater reliability was further evaluated in test II (n = 125) and test III (n = 96) by real-time assessments using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha.

resultsThe final inter-rater reliability (test III) was assessed as good with ICC 0.91 for the total score and 0.62-0.81 for the five items. Cronbach's alpha showed 0.95 for the total score.

conclusionALPS-Neo is a new assessment tool for optimising the management of pain and stress in newborn infants in the NICU. It has proved easy to implement and user-friendly, permitting fast, reliable observations with high inter-rater reliability.

Indexed as

HumansInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesIntensive Care, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, NeonatalObserver VariationPain MeasurementPsychometricsStress, PsychologicalDevelopmental carePainPain assessmentPain managementStress

Identifiers

PMID24813238
PMCPMC4368370
OpenAlexW2172095282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.