ArticleBlood cancer journal2014
Cancer-testis antigen MAGE-C2/CT10 induces spontaneous CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses in multiple myeloma patients.
Article in Blood cancer journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrative DNA methylation and gene expression analysis to assess the universality of the CpG island methylator phenotype.Human genomics · 2015Pooled it
- MAGE-C2/CT10 promotes growth and metastasis through upregulating c-Myc expression in prostate cancer.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2021Article
- Novel cancer antigens for personalized immunotherapies: latest evidence and clinical potential.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2016Review
- Cancer-testis antigen SLLP1 represents a promising target for the immunotherapy of multiple myeloma.Journal of translational medicine · 2015Article
- DNA vaccine for cancer immunotherapy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.